These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22273500)

  • 1. Attentional capture and understanding of nutrition labelling: a study based on response times.
    Ares G; Giménez A; Bruzzone F; Antúnez L; Sapolinski A; Vidal L; Maiche A
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2012 Sep; 63(6):679-88. PubMed ID: 22273500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How do design features influence consumer attention when looking for nutritional information on food labels? Results from an eye-tracking study on pan bread labels.
    Antúnez L; Vidal L; Sapolinski A; Giménez A; Maiche A; Ares G
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2013 Aug; 64(5):515-27. PubMed ID: 23301795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of Interpretation Aids on Attentional Capture, Visual Processing, and Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels.
    Antúnez L; Giménez A; Maiche A; Ares G
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2015; 47(4):292-9.e1. PubMed ID: 25878027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Product reformulation in the context of nutritional warning labels: Exploration of consumer preferences towards food concepts in three food categories.
    Ares G; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Antúnez L; Machín L; Vidal L; Giménez A
    Food Res Int; 2018 May; 107():669-674. PubMed ID: 29580533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of nutrition label format and product assortment on the healthfulness of food choice.
    Aschemann-Witzel J; Grunert KG; van Trijp HC; Bialkova S; Raats MM; Hodgkins C; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Koenigstorfer J
    Appetite; 2013 Dec; 71():63-74. PubMed ID: 23891558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market.
    Kelly B; Hughes C; Chapman K; Louie JC; Dixon H; Crawford J; King L; Daube M; Slevin T
    Health Promot Int; 2009 Jun; 24(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 19336501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints.
    van Herpen E; Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 21554909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Food labels: a critical assessment.
    Temple NJ; Fraser J
    Nutrition; 2014 Mar; 30(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 24139165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nutrition labels in bar graph format deemed most useful for consumer purchase decisions using adaptive conjoint analysis.
    Geiger CJ; Wyse BW; Parent CR; Hansen RG
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1991 Jul; 91(7):800-7. PubMed ID: 2071795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention mediates the effect of nutrition label information on consumers' choice. Evidence from a choice experiment involving eye-tracking.
    Bialkova S; Grunert KG; Juhl HJ; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Stysko-Kunkowska M; van Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2014 May; 76():66-75. PubMed ID: 24503332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Submissions to the Australian and New Zealand Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy support traffic light nutrition labelling.
    White J; Signal L
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2012 Oct; 36(5):446-51. PubMed ID: 23025366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The influence of labeling format on use and understanding of nutrition information: results of an experiment in workplace restaurants].
    Gomez P; Le Minous AE
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Feb; 60(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 22178230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.
    Maubach N; Hoek J; Mather D
    Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():67-77. PubMed ID: 25038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Traffic Light System Can Increase Healthfulness Perception: Implications for Policy Making.
    Machín L; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Giménez A; Ares G
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2018; 50(7):668-674. PubMed ID: 29627330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and reliability testing of a short questionnaire developed to assess consumers' use, understanding and perception of food labels.
    Mackison D; Wrieden WL; Anderson AS
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2010 Feb; 64(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 19904290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferring product healthfulness from nutrition labelling. The influence of reference points.
    van Herpen E; Hieke S; van Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2014 Jan; 72():138-49. PubMed ID: 24416796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children and adolescents' attitudes towards sugar reduction in dairy products.
    Yoo HJ; Machín L; Arrúa A; Antúnez L; Vidal L; Giménez A; Curutchet MR; Ares G
    Food Res Int; 2017 Apr; 94():108-114. PubMed ID: 28290360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The French OQALI survey on dairy products: comparison of nutrient contents and other nutrition information on labels among types of brands.
    Menard C; Dumas C; Gillot N; Laurent L; Labarbe B; Ireland J; Volatier JL
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2012 Aug; 25(4):323-33. PubMed ID: 22364435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective understanding of Nutri-Score Front-Of-Package nutrition label according to individual characteristics of subjects: Comparisons with other format labels.
    Egnell M; Ducrot P; Touvier M; Allès B; Hercberg S; Kesse-Guyot E; Julia C
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202095. PubMed ID: 30138359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marketing whole grain breads in Canada via food labels.
    Sumanac D; Mendelson R; Tarasuk V
    Appetite; 2013 Mar; 62():1-6. PubMed ID: 23178749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.