These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22273536)

  • 1. Taking advantage of the strengths of 2 different dietary assessment instruments to improve intake estimates for nutritional epidemiology.
    Carroll RJ; Midthune D; Subar AF; Shumakovich M; Freedman LS; Thompson FE; Kipnis V
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 175(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 22273536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining a Food Frequency Questionnaire With 24-Hour Recalls to Increase the Precision of Estimation of Usual Dietary Intakes-Evidence From the Validation Studies Pooling Project.
    Freedman LS; Midthune D; Arab L; Prentice RL; Subar AF; Willett W; Neuhouser ML; Tinker LF; Kipnis V
    Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 187(10):2227-2232. PubMed ID: 29917051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validating an FFQ for intake of episodically consumed foods: application to the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study.
    Midthune D; Schatzkin A; Subar AF; Thompson FE; Freedman LS; Carroll RJ; Shumakovich MA; Kipnis V
    Public Health Nutr; 2011 Jul; 14(7):1212-21. PubMed ID: 21486523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study.
    Schatzkin A; Kipnis V; Carroll RJ; Midthune D; Subar AF; Bingham S; Schoeller DA; Troiano RP; Freedman LS
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Dec; 32(6):1054-62. PubMed ID: 14681273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of dietary taste patterns as assessed by FFQ against 24-h recalls and biomarkers of exposure.
    van Langeveld AWB; Teo PS; Mars M; Feskens EJM; de Graaf C; de Vries JHM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2019 Jan; 73(1):132-140. PubMed ID: 30254242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the 24-Hour Recall as a Reference Instrument for Calibrating Other Self-Report Instruments in Nutritional Cohort Studies: Evidence From the Validation Studies Pooling Project.
    Freedman LS; Commins JM; Willett W; Tinker LF; Spiegelman D; Rhodes D; Potischman N; Neuhouser ML; Moshfegh AJ; Kipnis V; Baer DJ; Arab L; Prentice RL; Subar AF
    Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 186(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 28402488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for potassium and sodium intake.
    Freedman LS; Commins JM; Moler JE; Willett W; Tinker LF; Subar AF; Spiegelman D; Rhodes D; Potischman N; Neuhouser ML; Moshfegh AJ; Kipnis V; Arab L; Prentice RL
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 181(7):473-87. PubMed ID: 25787264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using enhanced regression calibration to combine dietary intake estimates from 24 h recall and FFQ reduces bias in diet-disease associations.
    Looman M; Boshuizen HC; Feskens EJ; Geelen A
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Oct; 22(15):2738-2746. PubMed ID: 31262375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a urinary sugars biomarker to assess measurement error in self-reported sugars intake in the nutrition and physical activity assessment study (NPAAS).
    Tasevska N; Midthune D; Tinker LF; Potischman N; Lampe JW; Neuhouser ML; Beasley JM; Van Horn L; Prentice RL; Kipnis V
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Dec; 23(12):2874-83. PubMed ID: 25234237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. BMI was found to be a consistent determinant related to misreporting of energy, protein and potassium intake using self-report and duplicate portion methods.
    Trijsburg L; Geelen A; Hollman PC; Hulshof PJ; Feskens EJ; Van't Veer P; Boshuizen HC; de Vries JH
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Mar; 20(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 27724995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A zero-augmented generalized gamma regression calibration to adjust for covariate measurement error: A case of an episodically consumed dietary intake.
    Agogo GO
    Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):94-109. PubMed ID: 27704599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of validity of food group intake by food frequency questionnaire between pre- and post- adjustment estimates derived from 2-day 24-hour recalls in combination with the probability of consumption.
    Kim DW; Oh SY; Kwon SO; Kim J
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(6):2655-61. PubMed ID: 22938437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement Error Affecting Web- and Paper-Based Dietary Assessment Instruments: Insights From the Multi-Cohort Eating and Activity Study for Understanding Reporting Error.
    Kirkpatrick SI; Troiano RP; Barrett B; Cunningham C; Subar AF; Park Y; Bowles HR; Freedman LS; Kipnis V; Rimm EB; Willett WC; Potischman N; Spielgelman D; Baer DJ; Schoeller DA; Dodd KW
    Am J Epidemiol; 2022 May; 191(6):1125-1139. PubMed ID: 35136928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling data with excess zeros and measurement error: application to evaluating relationships between episodically consumed foods and health outcomes.
    Kipnis V; Midthune D; Buckman DW; Dodd KW; Guenther PM; Krebs-Smith SM; Subar AF; Tooze JA; Carroll RJ; Freedman LS
    Biometrics; 2009 Dec; 65(4):1003-10. PubMed ID: 19302405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The accuracy of the Goldberg method for classifying misreporters of energy intake on a food frequency questionnaire and 24-h recalls: comparison with doubly labeled water.
    Tooze JA; Krebs-Smith SM; Troiano RP; Subar AF
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2012 May; 66(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 22127332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation and calibration of the Eating Assessment in Toddlers FFQ (EAT FFQ) for children, used in the Growing Up Milk - Lite (GUMLi) randomised controlled trial.
    Lovell AL; Davies PSW; Hill RJ; Milne T; Matsuyama M; Jiang Y; Chen RX; Heath AM; Grant CC; Wall CR
    Br J Nutr; 2021 Jan; 125(2):183-193. PubMed ID: 32799967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative validity of a web-based food frequency questionnaire for Danish adolescents.
    Bjerregaard AA; Halldorsson TI; Kampmann FB; Olsen SF; Tetens I
    Nutr J; 2018 Jan; 17(1):9. PubMed ID: 29329542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative validation of standard, picture-sort and meal-based food-frequency questionnaires adapted for an elderly population of low socio-economic status.
    Quandt SA; Vitolins MZ; Smith SL; Tooze JA; Bell RA; Davis CC; DeVellis RF; Arcury TA
    Public Health Nutr; 2007 May; 10(5):524-32. PubMed ID: 17411474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors relating to eating style, social desirability, body image and eating meals at home increase the precision of calibration equations correcting self-report measures of diet using recovery biomarkers: findings from the Women's Health Initiative.
    Mossavar-Rahmani Y; Tinker LF; Huang Y; Neuhouser ML; McCann SE; Seguin RA; Vitolins MZ; Curb JD; Prentice RL
    Nutr J; 2013 May; 12():63. PubMed ID: 23679960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and Cost-effectiveness of Technology-Assisted Dietary Assessment Comparing the Automated Self-administered Dietary Assessment Tool, Intake24, and an Image-Assisted Mobile Food Record 24-Hour Recall Relative to Observed Intake: Protocol for a Randomized Crossover Feeding Study.
    Whitton C; Healy JD; Collins CE; Mullan B; Rollo ME; Dhaliwal SS; Norman R; Boushey CJ; Delp EJ; Zhu F; McCaffrey TA; Kirkpatrick SI; Atyeo P; Mukhtar SA; Wright JL; Ramos-García C; Pollard CM; Kerr DA
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2021 Dec; 10(12):e32891. PubMed ID: 34924357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.