132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2227370)
41. Effect of misspecification of gene frequency on the two-point LOD score.
Pal DK; Durner M; Greenberg DA
Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Nov; 9(11):855-9. PubMed ID: 11781703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The power and robustness of maximum LOD score statistics.
Yoo YJ; Mendell NR
Ann Hum Genet; 2008 Jul; 72(Pt 4):566-74. PubMed ID: 18410472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Detection of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus by the lod score method: sample size and sampling considerations.
Demenais F; Lathrop GM; Lalouel JM
Ann Hum Genet; 1988 Jul; 52(3):237-46. PubMed ID: 3250332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The power to detect linkage in complex disease by means of simple LOD-score analyses.
Greenberg DA; Abreu P; Hodge SE
Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Sep; 63(3):870-9. PubMed ID: 9718328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. An alternative foundation for the planning and evaluation of linkage analysis. I. Decoupling "error probabilities" from "measures of evidence".
Strug LJ; Hodge SE
Hum Hered; 2006; 61(3):166-88. PubMed ID: 16865000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Using lod-score differences to determine mode of inheritance: a simple, robust method even in the presence of heterogeneity and reduced penetrance.
Greenberg DA; Berger B
Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Oct; 55(4):834-40. PubMed ID: 7942860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Estimation of recombination frequency in bi-parental genetic populations.
Sun Z; Li H; Zhang L; Wang J
Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Jun; 94(3):163-77. PubMed ID: 22892204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. HLODs, trait models, and ascertainment: implications of admixture for parameter estimation and linkage detection.
Vieland VJ; Logue M
Hum Hered; 2002; 53(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 11901268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Distribution of lod scores under uncertain mode of inheritance.
MacLean CJ; Bishop DT; Sherman SL; Diehl SR
Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 52(2):354-61. PubMed ID: 8430696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Loading the lods.
Lancet; 1990 Sep; 336(8718):778-9. PubMed ID: 1976149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Posterior probability of linkage and maximal lod score.
Génin E; Martinez M; Clerget-Darpoux F
Ann Hum Genet; 1995 Jan; 59(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 7762980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests.
Kong A; Cox NJ
Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Nov; 61(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 9345087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Phenocopies versus genetic heterogeneity: can we use phenocopy frequencies in linkage analysis to compensate for heterogeneity?
Durner M; Greenberg DA; Hodge SE
Hum Hered; 1996; 46(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 8854142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Determining linkage and mode of inheritance: mode scores and other methods.
Liang KY; Rathouz PJ; Beaty TH
Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(6):575-93. PubMed ID: 8968715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Programs for determining parameters in complex genetic models for linkage analysis: GEN-PAR and EPI-PAR.
Plaetke R; Byerley WF; Koehler W
Genet Epidemiol; 1991; 8(6):425-7. PubMed ID: 1806412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Major strengths and weaknesses of the lod score method.
Ott J
Adv Genet; 2001; 42():125-32. PubMed ID: 11037318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Lods, wrods, and mods: the interpretation of lod scores calculated under different models.
Hodge SE; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):329-42. PubMed ID: 7813895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. On the lod score method in linkage analysis.
Chotai J
Ann Hum Genet; 1984 Oct; 48(4):359-78. PubMed ID: 6497351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. On the choice of linkage statistics.
Margaritte-Jeannin P; Babron MC; Clerget-Darpoux F
BMC Proc; 2007; 1 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S102. PubMed ID: 18466442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Determining the linkage of disease-resistance genes to molecular markers: the LOD-SCORE method revisited with regard to necessary sample sizes.
Hühn M
Theor Appl Genet; 1995 May; 90(6):841-6. PubMed ID: 24172927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
