BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22275398)

  • 1. Extending pedigree analysis for uncertain parentage and diverse breeding systems.
    Lacy RC
    J Hered; 2012; 103(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 22275398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kinship-based management strategies for captive breeding programs when pedigrees are unknown or uncertain.
    Putnam AS; Ivy JA
    J Hered; 2014; 105(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24143031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methods and prospects for using molecular data in captive breeding programs: an empirical example using parma wallabies (Macropus parma).
    Ivy JA; Miller A; Lacy RC; Dewoody JA
    J Hered; 2009; 100(4):441-54. PubMed ID: 19423700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic approaches refine ex situ lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris) conservation.
    Gonçalves da Silva A; Lalonde DR; Quse V; Shoemaker A; Russello MA
    J Hered; 2010; 101(5):581-90. PubMed ID: 20484384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of animals with partially known ancestries in scientifically managed breeding programs.
    Willis K; Lacy RC
    Zoo Biol; 2016 Jul; 35(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 27232460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of incomplete pedigree on genetic management of the Dutch Landrace goat.
    Mucha S; Windig JJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Jun; 126(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 19646154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inbreeding and loss of genetic variation in a reintroduced population of Mauritius Kestrel.
    Ewing SR; Nager RG; Nicoll MA; Aumjaud A; Jones CG; Keller LF
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):395-404. PubMed ID: 18294297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of strategies for selecting breeding pairs to maximize genetic diversity retention in managed populations.
    Ivy JA; Lacy RC
    J Hered; 2012; 103(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 22246407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The genealogy and genetic viability of reintroduced Yellowstone grey wolves.
    Vonholdt BM; Stahler DR; Smith DW; Earl DA; Pollinger JP; Wayne RK
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Jan; 17(1):252-74. PubMed ID: 17877715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unravelling first-generation pedigrees in wild endangered salmon populations using molecular genetic markers.
    Herbinger CM; O'reilly PT; Verspoor E
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Jul; 15(8):2261-75. PubMed ID: 16780439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis and management of gene and allelic diversity in subdivided populations using the software program METAPOP.
    Pérez-Figueroa A; Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Caballero A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 888():261-75. PubMed ID: 22665286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impacts of early viability selection on management of inbreeding and genetic diversity in conservation.
    Grueber CE; Hogg CJ; Ivy JA; Belov K
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Apr; 24(8):1645-53. PubMed ID: 25735639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. POPREP: a generic report for population management.
    Groeneveld E; Westhuizen Bv; Maiwashe A; Voordewind F; Ferraz JB
    Genet Mol Res; 2009 Sep; 8(3):1158-78. PubMed ID: 19866435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consequences for diversity when prioritizing animals for conservation with pedigree or genomic information.
    Engelsma KA; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP; Windig JJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Dec; 128(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 22059581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pedigrees and microsatellites among endangered ungulates: what do they tell us?
    Ruiz-López MJ; Roldán ER; Espeso G; Gomendio M
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Apr; 18(7):1352-64. PubMed ID: 19368643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic diversity, inbreeding and breeding practices in dogs: results from pedigree analyses.
    Leroy G
    Vet J; 2011 Aug; 189(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 21737321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parentage analysis with few contributing breeders: validation and improvement.
    Duchesne P; Meldgaard T; Berrebi P
    J Hered; 2008; 99(3):323-34. PubMed ID: 18252730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient computation of the kinship coefficients.
    Kirkpatrick B; Ge S; Wang L
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 35(6):1002-1008. PubMed ID: 30165566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency of the use of pedigree and molecular marker information in conservation programs.
    Fernández J; Villanueva B; Pong-Wong R; Toro MA
    Genetics; 2005 Jul; 170(3):1313-21. PubMed ID: 15879510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objectives, criteria and methods for using molecular genetic data in priority setting for conservation of animal genetic resources.
    Boettcher PJ; Tixier-Boichard M; Toro MA; Simianer H; Eding H; Gandini G; Joost S; Garcia D; Colli L; Ajmone-Marsan P;
    Anim Genet; 2010 May; 41 Suppl 1():64-77. PubMed ID: 20500756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.