205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22275589)
1. Towards brain-robot interfaces in stroke rehabilitation.
Gomez-Rodriguez M; Grosse-Wentrup M; Hill J; Gharabaghi A; Scholkopf B; Peters J
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975385. PubMed ID: 22275589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery.
Gomez-Rodriguez M; Peters J; Hill J; Schölkopf B; Gharabaghi A; Grosse-Wentrup M
J Neural Eng; 2011 Jun; 8(3):036005. PubMed ID: 21474878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary results of BRAVO project: brain computer interfaces for Robotic enhanced Action in Visuo-motOr tasks.
Bergamasco M; Frisoli A; Fontana M; Loconsole C; Leonardis D; Troncossi M; Foumashi MM; Parenti-Castelli V
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975377. PubMed ID: 22275581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design & control of a 3D stroke rehabilitation platform.
Cai Z; Tong D; Meadmore KL; Freeman CT; Hughes AM; Rogers E; Burridge JH
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975412. PubMed ID: 22275615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling upper limb clinical scales by robot-measured performance parameters.
Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Pisano F; Delconte C
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975401. PubMed ID: 22275604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resting state changes in functional connectivity correlate with movement recovery for BCI and robot-assisted upper-extremity training after stroke.
Várkuti B; Guan C; Pan Y; Phua KS; Ang KK; Kuah CW; Chua K; Ang BT; Birbaumer N; Sitaram R
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2013 Jan; 27(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 22645108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Online learning and adaptation of patient support during ADL training.
Guidali M; Schlink P; Duschau-Wicke A; Riener R
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975434. PubMed ID: 22275635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wrist rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients by means of adaptive, progressive robot-aided therapy.
Squeri V; Masia L; Giannoni P; Sandini G; Morasso P
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Mar; 22(2):312-25. PubMed ID: 23508271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility studies of robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation at clinic and home settings using RUPERT.
Zhang H; Austin H; Buchanan S; Herman R; Koeneman J; He J
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975440. PubMed ID: 22275640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A decision-theoretic approach in the design of an adaptive upper-limb stroke rehabilitation robot.
Huq R; Kan P; Goetschalckx R; Hébert D; Hoey J; Mihailidis A
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975418. PubMed ID: 22275621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A variable structure pantograph mechanism for comprehensive upper extremity haptic movement training.
Oblak J; Perry JC; Jung JH; Cikajlo I; Keller T; Matjacić Z
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():5859-62. PubMed ID: 21096924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.
Zollo L; Gallotta E; Guglielmelli E; Sterzi S
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 47(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 21445028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feedforward model based arm weight compensation with the rehabilitation robot ARMin.
Just F; Ozen O; Tortora S; Riener R; Rauter G
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():72-77. PubMed ID: 28813796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic arm skate for stroke rehabilitation.
Wong CK; Jordan K; King M
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975389. PubMed ID: 22275593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving robotics for neurorehabilitation: enhancing engagement, performance, and learning with auditory feedback.
Rosati G; Oscari F; Reinkensmeyer DJ; Secoli R; Avanzini F; Spagnol S; Masiero S
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975373. PubMed ID: 22275577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of the progression and future implications of brain-computer interface therapies for restoration of distal upper extremity motor function after stroke.
Remsik A; Young B; Vermilyea R; Kiekhoefer L; Abrams J; Evander Elmore S; Schultz P; Nair V; Edwards D; Williams J; Prabhakaran V
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2016 May; 13(5):445-54. PubMed ID: 27112213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot therapy of the upper limb in stroke patients: preliminary experiences for the principle-based use of this technology.
Casadio M; Giannoni P; Masia L; Morasso P; Sandini G; Sanguineti V; Squeri V; Vergaro E
Funct Neurol; 2009; 24(4):195-202. PubMed ID: 20412725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Design and control of RUPERT: a device for robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy.
Sugar TG; He J; Koeneman EJ; Koeneman JB; Herman R; Huang H; Schultz RS; Herring DE; Wanberg J; Balasubramanian S; Swenson P; Ward JA
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 17894266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation.
Masiero S; Poli P; Rosati G; Zanotto D; Iosa M; Paolucci S; Morone G
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2014 Mar; 11(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 24479445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
