215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22275595)
1. Effector force requirements to enable robotic systems to provide assisted exercise in people with upper limb impairment after stroke.
Jackson AE; Culmer PR; Levesley MC; Cozens JA; Makower SG; Bhakta BB
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975391. PubMed ID: 22275595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery of subacute stroke patients: a kinematic approach.
Mazzoleni S; Carrozza MC; Sale P; Franceschini M; Posteraro F; Tiboni M
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650503. PubMed ID: 24187318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Post-stroke robotic training of the upper limb in the early rehabilitation phase.
Masiero S; Rosati G; Valarini S; Rossi A
Funct Neurol; 2009; 24(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 20412726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exerciser for rehabilitation of the Arm (ERA): Development and unique features of a 3D end-effector robot.
Milot MH; Hamel M; Provost PO; Bernier-Ouellet J; Dupuis M; Letourneau D; Briere S; Michaud F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5833-5836. PubMed ID: 28269581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance-based robotic assistance during rhythmic arm exercises.
Leconte P; Ronsse R
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Sep; 13(1):82. PubMed ID: 27623806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design and control of RUPERT: a device for robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy.
Sugar TG; He J; Koeneman EJ; Koeneman JB; Herman R; Huang H; Schultz RS; Herring DE; Wanberg J; Balasubramanian S; Swenson P; Ward JA
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 17894266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of complementing a robotic upper limb rehabilitation system with video games on the engagement of the participants: a study focusing on muscle activities.
Li C; Rusák Z; Horváth I; Ji L
Int J Rehabil Res; 2014 Dec; 37(4):334-42. PubMed ID: 25221845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment.
Sanchez RJ; Liu J; Rao S; Shah P; Smith R; Rahman T; Cramer SC; Bobrow JE; Reinkensmeyer DJ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Sep; 14(3):378-89. PubMed ID: 17009498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EMU: A transparent 3D robotic manipulandum for upper-limb rehabilitation.
Fong J; Crocher V; Tan Y; Oetomo D; Mareels I
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():771-776. PubMed ID: 28813913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.
Zollo L; Gallotta E; Guglielmelli E; Sterzi S
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 47(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 21445028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic unilateral and bilateral upper-limb movement training for stroke survivors afflicted by chronic hemiparesis.
Simkins M; Kim H; Abrams G; Byl N; Rosen J
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650506. PubMed ID: 24187321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation.
Masiero S; Armani M; Ferlini G; Rosati G; Rossi A
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 24316679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A robotic workstation for stroke rehabilitation of the upper extremity using FES.
Freeman CT; Hughes AM; Burridge JH; Chappell PH; Lewin PL; Rogers E
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Apr; 31(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 18640865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic therapy provides a stimulus for upper limb motor recovery after stroke that is complementary to and distinct from conventional therapy.
Brokaw EB; Nichols D; Holley RJ; Lum PS
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 May; 28(4):367-76. PubMed ID: 24297763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A proof of concept study investigating the feasibility of combining iPAM robot assisted rehabilitation with functional electrical stimulation to deliver whole arm exercise in stroke survivors.
O'Connor RJ; Jackson A; Makower SG; Cozens A; Levesley M
J Med Eng Technol; 2014; 39(7):411-8. PubMed ID: 26414146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke.
Babaiasl M; Mahdioun SH; Jaryani P; Yazdani M
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 25600057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-aided therapy on the upper limb of subacute and chronic stroke patients: a biomechanical approach.
Mazzoleni S; Filippi M; Carrozza MC; Posteraro F; Puzzolante L; Falchi E
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975422. PubMed ID: 22275623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot assisted upper limb therapy combined with upper limb rehabilitation was at least as effective on a range of outcomes, and cost less to deliver, as an equal dose of upper limb rehabilitation alone for people with stroke.
Imms C; Wallen M; Laver K
Aust Occup Ther J; 2015 Feb; 62(1):74-6. PubMed ID: 25649038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a fuzzy logic based intelligent system for autonomous guidance of post-stroke rehabilitation exercise.
Huq R; Wang R; Lu E; Hebert D; Lacheray H; Mihailidis A
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650472. PubMed ID: 24187289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
