215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22275595)
21. Mechanisms of motor recovery in chronic and subacute stroke patients following a robot-aided training.
Mazzoleni S; Puzzolante L; Zollo L; Dario P; Posteraro F
IEEE Trans Haptics; 2014; 7(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 24968381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.
Washabaugh EP; Treadway E; Gillespie RB; Remy CD; Krishnan C
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(6):693-708. PubMed ID: 30400120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Rehabilitation for hemiplegia using an upper limb training system based on a force direction.
Ogata K; Hirabayashi Y; Kubota K; Hasegawa Y; Tsuji T
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():533-538. PubMed ID: 28813875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A decision-theoretic approach in the design of an adaptive upper-limb stroke rehabilitation robot.
Huq R; Kan P; Goetschalckx R; Hébert D; Hoey J; Mihailidis A
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975418. PubMed ID: 22275621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Poststroke upper limb recovery.
Tsu AP; Abrams GM; Byl NN
Semin Neurol; 2014 Nov; 34(5):485-95. PubMed ID: 25520020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robot therapy of the upper limb in stroke patients: preliminary experiences for the principle-based use of this technology.
Casadio M; Giannoni P; Masia L; Morasso P; Sandini G; Sanguineti V; Squeri V; Vergaro E
Funct Neurol; 2009; 24(4):195-202. PubMed ID: 20412725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development of the iPAM MkII system and description of a randomized control trial with acute stroke patients.
Jackson AE; Levesley MC; Makower SG; Cozens JA; Bhakta BB
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650407. PubMed ID: 24187226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. RUPERT closed loop control design.
Balasubramanian S; Wei R; He J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3467-70. PubMed ID: 19163455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
Liao WW; Wu CY; Hsieh YW; Lin KC; Chang WY
Clin Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 26(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 21840917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Including upper extremity robotic therapy during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation may not lead to better outcomes than conventional treatment.
Pang MY
J Physiother; 2014 Sep; 60(3):166. PubMed ID: 25084629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Robotic training and clinical assessment of upper extremity movements after spinal cord injury: a single case report.
Yozbatiran N; Berliner J; O'Malley MK; Pehlivan AU; Kadivar Z; Boake C; Francisco GE
J Rehabil Med; 2012 Feb; 44(2):186-8. PubMed ID: 22334347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Commentary to: including upper extremity robotic therapy during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation may not lead to better outcomes than conventional treatment.
Tong RK
J Physiother; 2014 Sep; 60(3):166. PubMed ID: 25084630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation.
Masiero S; Poli P; Rosati G; Zanotto D; Iosa M; Paolucci S; Morone G
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2014 Mar; 11(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 24479445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic arm skate for stroke rehabilitation.
Wong CK; Jordan K; King M
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975389. PubMed ID: 22275593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke.
Chang JJ; Tung WL; Wu WL; Huang MH; Su FC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 88(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 17908578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Upper limb rehabilitation robotics after stroke: a perspective from the University of Padua, Italy.
Masiero S; Carraro E; Ferraro C; Gallina P; Rossi A; Rosati G
J Rehabil Med; 2009 Nov; 41(12):981-5. PubMed ID: 19841828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotic and Sensor Technology for Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
Jakob I; Kollreider A; Germanotta M; Benetti F; Cruciani A; Padua L; Aprile I
PM R; 2018 Sep; 10(9 Suppl 2):S189-S197. PubMed ID: 30269805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Improving proprioceptive deficits after stroke through robot-assisted training of the upper limb: a pilot case report study.
Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
Neurocase; 2016; 22(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 26565132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A tailored exercise of manipulation of virtual tools to treat upper limb impairment in Multiple Sclerosis.
Basteris A; De Luca A; Sanguineti V; Solaro C; Mueller M; Carpinella I; Cattaneo D; Bertoni R; Ferrarin M
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975509. PubMed ID: 22275705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A novel robotic system for quantifying arm kinematics and kinetics: description and evaluation in therapist-assisted passive arm movements post-stroke.
Culmer PR; Jackson AE; Makower SG; Cozens JA; Levesley MC; Mon-Williams M; Bhakta B
J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Apr; 197(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 21414360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
