These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22275595)
41. A robotic device as a sensitive quantitative tool to assess upper limb impairments in stroke patients: a preliminary prospective cohort study. Gilliaux M; Lejeune T; Detrembleur C; Sapin J; Dehez B; Stoquart G J Rehabil Med; 2012 Mar; 44(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22367455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Upper limb stroke rehabilitation: the effectiveness of Stimulation Assistance through Iterative Learning (SAIL). Meadmore KL; Cai Z; Tong D; Hughes AM; Freeman CT; Rogers E; Burridge JH IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975502. PubMed ID: 22275698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Preliminary results of BRAVO project: brain computer interfaces for Robotic enhanced Action in Visuo-motOr tasks. Bergamasco M; Frisoli A; Fontana M; Loconsole C; Leonardis D; Troncossi M; Foumashi MM; Parenti-Castelli V IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975377. PubMed ID: 22275581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A pilot study of activity-based therapy in the arm motor recovery post stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Rabadi M; Galgano M; Lynch D; Akerman M; Lesser M; Volpe B Clin Rehabil; 2008 Dec; 22(12):1071-82. PubMed ID: 19052246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Robotic training and kinematic analysis of arm and hand after incomplete spinal cord injury: a case study. Kadivar Z; Sullivan JL; Eng DP; Pehlivan AU; O'Malley MK; Yozbatiran N; Francisco GE IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975429. PubMed ID: 22275630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Fine finger motor skill training with exoskeleton robotic hand in chronic stroke: stroke rehabilitation. Ockenfeld C; Tong RK; Susanto EA; Ho SK; Hu XL IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650392. PubMed ID: 24187211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Design & control of a 3D stroke rehabilitation platform. Cai Z; Tong D; Meadmore KL; Freeman CT; Hughes AM; Rogers E; Burridge JH IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975412. PubMed ID: 22275615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Electromyography-controlled exoskeletal upper-limb-powered orthosis for exercise training after stroke. Stein J; Narendran K; McBean J; Krebs K; Hughes R Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Apr; 86(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 17413538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Cognitive-Motor Interference on Upper Extremity Motor Performance in a Robot-Assisted Planar Reaching Task Among Patients With Stroke. Shin JH; Park G; Cho DY Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 98(4):730-737. PubMed ID: 28049003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Hesse S; Waldner A; Mehrholz J; Tomelleri C; Pohl M; Werner C Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2011; 25(9):838-46. PubMed ID: 21825004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: a review and clinical perspective. Bishop L; Stein J NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 33(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23949043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Upper limb training/assessment program using passive force controllable rehabilitation system. Kikuchi T; Sato C; Yamabe K; Abe I; Ohno T; Kugimiya S; Inoue A IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():505-510. PubMed ID: 28813870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Development and validation of the first robotic scale for the clinical assessment of upper extremity motor impairments in stroke patients. Einav O; Geva D; Yoeli D; Kerzhner M; Mauritz KH Top Stroke Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 18 Suppl 1():587-98. PubMed ID: 22120028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Dynamic biomechanical model for assessing and monitoring robot-assisted upper-limb therapy. Abdullah HA; Tarry C; Datta R; Mittal GS; Abderrahim M J Rehabil Res Dev; 2007; 44(1):43-62. PubMed ID: 17551857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Effects of treatment intensity in upper limb robot-assisted therapy for chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Hsieh YW; Wu CY; Liao WW; Lin KC; Wu KY; Lee CY Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2011; 25(6):503-11. PubMed ID: 21436390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtual-reality and telemedicine approach. Piron L; Turolla A; Agostini M; Zucconi C; Cortese F; Zampolini M; Zannini M; Dam M; Ventura L; Battauz M; Tonin P J Rehabil Med; 2009 Nov; 41(12):1016-102. PubMed ID: 19841835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assisted movement with enhanced sensation (AMES): coupling motor and sensory to remediate motor deficits in chronic stroke patients. Cordo P; Lutsep H; Cordo L; Wright WG; Cacciatore T; Skoss R Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009 Jan; 23(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 18645190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Unilateral versus bilateral upper limb training after stroke: the Upper Limb Training After Stroke clinical trial. van Delden AL; Peper CL; Nienhuys KN; Zijp NI; Beek PJ; Kwakkel G Stroke; 2013 Sep; 44(9):2613-6. PubMed ID: 23868279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]