160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22275621)
1. A decision-theoretic approach in the design of an adaptive upper-limb stroke rehabilitation robot.
Huq R; Kan P; Goetschalckx R; Hébert D; Hoey J; Mihailidis A
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975418. PubMed ID: 22275621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The development of an adaptive upper-limb stroke rehabilitation robotic system.
Kan P; Huq R; Hoey J; Goetschalckx R; Mihailidis A
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2011 Jun; 8():33. PubMed ID: 21679457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Post-stroke robotic training of the upper limb in the early rehabilitation phase.
Masiero S; Rosati G; Valarini S; Rossi A
Funct Neurol; 2009; 24(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 20412726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effector force requirements to enable robotic systems to provide assisted exercise in people with upper limb impairment after stroke.
Jackson AE; Culmer PR; Levesley MC; Cozens JA; Makower SG; Bhakta BB
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975391. PubMed ID: 22275595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modeling upper limb clinical scales by robot-measured performance parameters.
Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Pisano F; Delconte C
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975401. PubMed ID: 22275604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic arm skate for stroke rehabilitation.
Wong CK; Jordan K; King M
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975389. PubMed ID: 22275593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design & control of a 3D stroke rehabilitation platform.
Cai Z; Tong D; Meadmore KL; Freeman CT; Hughes AM; Rogers E; Burridge JH
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975412. PubMed ID: 22275615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-aided therapy on the upper limb of subacute and chronic stroke patients: a biomechanical approach.
Mazzoleni S; Filippi M; Carrozza MC; Posteraro F; Puzzolante L; Falchi E
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975422. PubMed ID: 22275623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards brain-robot interfaces in stroke rehabilitation.
Gomez-Rodriguez M; Grosse-Wentrup M; Hill J; Gharabaghi A; Scholkopf B; Peters J
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975385. PubMed ID: 22275589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Design and control of RUPERT: a device for robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy.
Sugar TG; He J; Koeneman EJ; Koeneman JB; Herman R; Huang H; Schultz RS; Herring DE; Wanberg J; Balasubramanian S; Swenson P; Ward JA
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):336-46. PubMed ID: 17894266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Upper limb stroke rehabilitation: the effectiveness of Stimulation Assistance through Iterative Learning (SAIL).
Meadmore KL; Cai Z; Tong D; Hughes AM; Freeman CT; Rogers E; Burridge JH
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975502. PubMed ID: 22275698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance based upper extremity training: a pilot study evaluation with the GENTLE/A rehabilitation system.
Chemuturi R; Amirabdollahian F; Dautenhahn K
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650380. PubMed ID: 24187199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Taking a lesson from patients' recovery strategies to optimize training during robot-aided rehabilitation.
Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 May; 20(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 22623406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three upper limb robotic devices for stroke rehabilitation: a review and clinical perspective.
Bishop L; Stein J
NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 33(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23949043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation.
Masiero S; Poli P; Rosati G; Zanotto D; Iosa M; Paolucci S; Morone G
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2014 Mar; 11(2):187-98. PubMed ID: 24479445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of complementing a robotic upper limb rehabilitation system with video games on the engagement of the participants: a study focusing on muscle activities.
Li C; Rusák Z; Horváth I; Ji L
Int J Rehabil Res; 2014 Dec; 37(4):334-42. PubMed ID: 25221845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting Functional Recovery in Chronic Stroke Rehabilitation Using Event-Related Desynchronization-Synchronization during Robot-Assisted Movement.
Caimmi M; Visani E; Digiacomo F; Scano A; Chiavenna A; Gramigna C; Molinari Tosatti L; Franceschetti S; Molteni F; Panzica F
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7051340. PubMed ID: 27057546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of upper limb sense of position in healthy individuals and patients after stroke.
Cusmano I; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Ramat S; Delconte C; Pisano F; Colombo R
J Healthc Eng; 2014; 5(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 24918181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
