136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22275658)
1. The ACT-4D: a novel rehabilitation robot for the quantification of upper limb motor impairments following brain injury.
Stienen AH; McPherson JG; Schouten AC; Dewald JP
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975460. PubMed ID: 22275658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wrist and Finger Torque Sensor for the quantification of upper limb motor impairments following brain injury.
Stienen AH; Moulton TS; Miller LC; Dewald JP
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975464. PubMed ID: 22275662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A variable structure pantograph mechanism for comprehensive upper extremity haptic movement training.
Oblak J; Perry JC; Jung JH; Cikajlo I; Keller T; Matjacić Z
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():5859-62. PubMed ID: 21096924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke.
Babaiasl M; Mahdioun SH; Jaryani P; Yazdani M
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(4):263-80. PubMed ID: 25600057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study.
Park JH; Park G; Kim HY; Lee JY; Ham Y; Hwang D; Kwon S; Shin JH
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Oct; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 33076952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective measurement of synergistic movement patterns of the upper extremity following stroke: an explorative study.
Krabben T; Prange GB; Molier BI; Rietman JS; Buurke JH
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975430. PubMed ID: 22275631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Towards brain-robot interfaces in stroke rehabilitation.
Gomez-Rodriguez M; Grosse-Wentrup M; Hill J; Gharabaghi A; Scholkopf B; Peters J
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975385. PubMed ID: 22275589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Construction of efficacious gait and upper limb functional interventions based on brain plasticity evidence and model-based measures for stroke patients.
Daly JJ; Ruff RL
ScientificWorldJournal; 2007 Dec; 7():2031-45. PubMed ID: 18167618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design and analysis of a compatible exoskeleton rehabilitation robot system based on upper limb movement mechanism.
Ning Y; Wang H; Liu Y; Wang Q; Rong Y; Niu J
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2024 Mar; 62(3):883-899. PubMed ID: 38081953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Human arm joints reconstruction algorithm in rehabilitation therapies assisted by end-effector robotic devices.
Bertomeu-Motos A; Blanco A; Badesa FJ; Barios JA; Zollo L; Garcia-Aracil N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 15(1):10. PubMed ID: 29458397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary research of a novel center-driven robot for upper extremity rehabilitation.
Cao W; Zhang F; Yu H; Hu B; Meng Q
Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(3):409-420. PubMed ID: 29400683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.
Washabaugh EP; Treadway E; Gillespie RB; Remy CD; Krishnan C
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(6):693-708. PubMed ID: 30400120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptive hybrid robotic system for rehabilitation of reaching movement after a brain injury: a usability study.
Resquín F; Gonzalez-Vargas J; Ibáñez J; Brunetti F; Dimbwadyo I; Carrasco L; Alves S; Gonzalez-Alted C; Gomez-Blanco A; Pons JL
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Oct; 14(1):104. PubMed ID: 29025427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional electrical stimulation mediated by iterative learning control and 3D robotics reduces motor impairment in chronic stroke.
Meadmore KL; Hughes AM; Freeman CT; Cai Z; Tong D; Burridge JH; Rogers E
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2012 Jun; 9():32. PubMed ID: 22676920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling upper limb clinical scales by robot-measured performance parameters.
Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Pisano F; Delconte C
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975401. PubMed ID: 22275604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic training and kinematic analysis of arm and hand after incomplete spinal cord injury: a case study.
Kadivar Z; Sullivan JL; Eng DP; Pehlivan AU; O'Malley MK; Yozbatiran N; Francisco GE
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975429. PubMed ID: 22275630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of robot therapy on upper body kinematics and arm function in persons post stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Carpinella I; Lencioni T; Bowman T; Bertoni R; Turolla A; Ferrarin M; Jonsdottir J
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Jan; 17(1):10. PubMed ID: 32000790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exerciser for rehabilitation of the Arm (ERA): Development and unique features of a 3D end-effector robot.
Milot MH; Hamel M; Provost PO; Bernier-Ouellet J; Dupuis M; Letourneau D; Briere S; Michaud F
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():5833-5836. PubMed ID: 28269581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel robotic system for quantifying arm kinematics and kinetics: description and evaluation in therapist-assisted passive arm movements post-stroke.
Culmer PR; Jackson AE; Makower SG; Cozens JA; Levesley MC; Mon-Williams M; Bhakta B
J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Apr; 197(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 21414360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A planar 3DOF robotic exoskeleton for rehabilitation and assessment.
Ball SJ; Brown IE; Scott SH
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4024-7. PubMed ID: 18002882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
