These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22275678)

  • 21. Toward Balance Recovery With Leg Prostheses Using Neuromuscular Model Control.
    Thatte N; Geyer H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 May; 63(5):904-913. PubMed ID: 26315935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Antagonistic active knee prosthesis. A metabolic cost of walking comparison with a variable-damping prosthetic knee.
    Martinez-Villalpando EC; Mooney L; Elliott G; Herr H
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():8519-22. PubMed ID: 22256326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Biomechanics and evaluation of the microprocessor-controlled C-Leg exoprosthesis knee joint].
    Stinus H
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2000; 138(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 10929622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of prosthetic ankle energy storage and return properties on muscle activity in below-knee amputee walking.
    Ventura JD; Klute GK; Neptune RR
    Gait Posture; 2011 Feb; 33(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 21145747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dynamic input to determine hip joint moments, power and work on the prosthetic limb of transfemoral amputees: ground reaction vs knee reaction.
    Frossard L; Cheze L; Dumas R
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 21697197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Local dynamic stability of amputees wearing a torsion adapter compared to a rigid adapter during straight-line and turning gait.
    Segal AD; Orendurff MS; Czerniecki JM; Shofer JB; Klute GK
    J Biomech; 2010 Oct; 43(14):2798-803. PubMed ID: 20719315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Loading applied on prosthetic knee of transfemoral amputee: comparison of inverse dynamics and direct measurements.
    Dumas R; Cheze L; Frossard L
    Gait Posture; 2009 Nov; 30(4):560-2. PubMed ID: 19709886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Biomechanical Comparison of Proportional Electromyography Control to Biological Torque Control Using a Powered Hip Exoskeleton.
    Young AJ; Gannon H; Ferris DP
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2017; 5():37. PubMed ID: 28713810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Control of a powered ankle-foot prosthesis based on a neuromuscular model.
    Eilenberg MF; Geyer H; Herr H
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2010 Apr; 18(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 20071268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Myoelectric Control for Adaptable Biomechanical Energy Harvesting.
    Selinger JC; Donelan JM
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Mar; 24(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 26841402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ground adaptive standing controller for a powered transfemoral prosthesis.
    Lawson BE; Varol HA; Goldfarb M
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975475. PubMed ID: 22275673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intrinsic muscle strength and voluntary activation of both lower limbs and functional performance after stroke.
    Horstman AM; Beltman MJ; Gerrits KH; Koppe P; Janssen TW; Elich P; de Haan A
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2008 Jul; 28(4):251-61. PubMed ID: 18355344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Conventional 4-bar linkage knee mechanisms: a strength-weakness analysis.
    de Vries J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1995 Feb; 32(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 7760266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamic modeling and torque estimation of FES-assisted arm-free standing for paraplegics.
    Kim JY; Popovic MR; Mills JK
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2006 Mar; 14(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 16562631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Model-free robust adaptive integral sliding mode impedance control of knee-ankle-toe active transfemoral prosthesis.
    Wu Z; Chen Y; Geng Y; Wang X; Xuan B
    Int J Med Robot; 2022 Jun; 18(3):e2378. PubMed ID: 35133713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of transtibial amputee and non-amputee biomechanics during a common turning task.
    Segal AD; Orendurff MS; Czerniecki JM; Schoen J; Klute GK
    Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 20974535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of weight and starting height on lifting mechanics in lower extremity amputees.
    Lieber SJ; Boston JR; Rudy TE; Munin MC
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2002 Jun; 10(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 12236448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in the coordination of agonist and antagonist muscle groups in below-knee amputee and able-bodied children during dynamic exercise.
    Centomo H; Amarantini D; Martin L; Prince F
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Jun; 18(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 17276084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. User-modulated impedance control of a prosthetic elbow in unconstrained, perturbed motion.
    Sensinger JW; ff Weir RF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1043-55. PubMed ID: 18334396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses.
    Stein RB; Walley M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.