These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22276404)

  • 1. Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context.
    Patterson JT; Carter M; Sanli E
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2011 Dec; 82(4):624-33. PubMed ID: 22276404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals.
    Patterson JT; Carter M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2010 Apr; 29(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 20338655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-controlled KR schedules: does repetition order matter?
    Patterson JT; Carter MJ; Hansen S
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Aug; 32(4):567-79. PubMed ID: 24054895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-controlled knowledge of results: age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection.
    Carter MJ; Patterson JT
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Dec; 31(6):1459-72. PubMed ID: 23164628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not enhance the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules.
    Carter MJ; Smith V; Carlsen AN; Ste-Marie DM
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):496-506. PubMed ID: 28243728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An interpolated activity during the knowledge-of-results delay interval eliminates the learning advantages of self-controlled feedback schedules.
    Carter MJ; Ste-Marie DM
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):399-406. PubMed ID: 26892773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. External Control of Knowledge of Results: Learner Involvement Enhances Motor Skill Transfer.
    Figueiredo LS; Ugrinowitsch H; Freire AB; Shea JB; Benda RN
    Percept Mot Skills; 2018 Apr; 125(2):400-416. PubMed ID: 29350078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feedback schedules for motor-skill learning: the similarities and differences between physical and observational practice.
    Badets A; Blandin Y
    J Mot Behav; 2010; 42(4):257-68. PubMed ID: 20862778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of erroneous knowledge of results on transfer of anticipation timing.
    McNevin N; Magill RA; Buekers MJ
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1994 Dec; 65(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 7886281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Average-KR schedule benefits generalized motor program learning.
    Yao WX
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Aug; 97(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 14604038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment.
    Janelle CM; Barba DA; Frehlich SG; Tennant LK; Cauraugh JH
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1997 Dec; 68(4):269-79. PubMed ID: 9421839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-control of feedback during motor learning: accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control over feedback.
    Hansen S; Pfeiffer J; Patterson JT
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 21347953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the Preferred Self-Controlled KR Schedules of Learners and Peers During Motor Skill Learning.
    McRae M; Patterson JT; Hansen S
    J Mot Behav; 2015; 47(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 25893852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Average KR schedule in learning of timing: influence of length for summary knowledge of results and task complexity.
    Ishikura T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):911-24. PubMed ID: 16491697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of aging and reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results on learning a motor skill.
    Wishart LR; Lee TD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 1):1107-22. PubMed ID: 9172230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emergent patterns of feedback strategies in performing a closed motor skill.
    Chen DD; Kaufman D; Chung MW
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Aug; 93(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 11693686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-controlled feedback: does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?
    Chiviacowsky S; Wulf G
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2002 Dec; 73(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 12495242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of knowledge of results scheduling methods for promoting motor skill acquisition and retention.
    Weeks DL; Sherwood DE
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1994 Jun; 65(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 8047705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of knowledge of results delay and the subjective estimation of movement form on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill.
    Liu J; Wrisberg CA
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1997 Jun; 68(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 9200248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of self-control and instructor-control feedback on motor learning in individuals with cerebral palsy.
    Hemayattalab R
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2766-72. PubMed ID: 25086427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.