These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22276547)

  • 1. Sexual conflict and antagonistic coevolution across water strider populations.
    Perry JC; Rowe L
    Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):544-57. PubMed ID: 22276547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects.
    Arnqvist G; Rowe L
    Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6873):787-9. PubMed ID: 11845208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual conflict in Gerris gillettei (Insecta: Hemiptera): intraspecific intersexual correlated morphology and experimental assessment of behaviour and fitness.
    Gagnon MC; Turgeon J
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Jul; 24(7):1505-16. PubMed ID: 21545424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexually antagonistic coevolution in insects is associated with only limited morphological diversity.
    Eberhard W
    J Evol Biol; 2006 May; 19(3):657-81. PubMed ID: 16674564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Function, developmental genetics, and fitness consequences of a sexually antagonistic trait.
    Khila A; Abouheif E; Rowe L
    Science; 2012 May; 336(6081):585-9. PubMed ID: 22556252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexually antagonistic coevolution in a mating system: combining experimental and comparative approaches to address evolutionary processes.
    Rowe L; Arnqvist G
    Evolution; 2002 Apr; 56(4):754-67. PubMed ID: 12038533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution.
    Rowe L; Cameron E; Day T
    Am Nat; 2005 May; 165 Suppl 5():S5-18. PubMed ID: 15795862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of ecology, neutral processes and antagonistic coevolution in an apparent sexual arms race.
    Perry JC; Garroway CJ; Rowe L
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Sep; 20(9):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 28683517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antagonistic pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection on male body size in a water strider (Gerris lacustris).
    Danielsson I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Jan; 268(1462):77-81. PubMed ID: 12123301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: testing two hypotheses for Rensch's rule in the water strider Aquarius remigis.
    Fairbairn DJ
    Am Nat; 2005 Oct; 166 Suppl 4():S69-84. PubMed ID: 16224713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice.
    Eberhard WG
    Evolution; 2004 Sep; 58(9):1947-70. PubMed ID: 15521454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dynamics of sexually antagonistic coevolution and the complex influences of mating system and genetic correlation.
    Härdling R; Karlsson K
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 19500598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella.
    Lewis Z; Wedell N; Hunt J
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2085-97. PubMed ID: 21729062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Size-assortative mating and sexual size dimorphism are predictable from simple mechanics of mate-grasping behavior.
    Han CS; Jablonski PG; Kim B; Park FC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2010 Nov; 10():359. PubMed ID: 21092131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative mating strategies and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in the side-blotched lizard, Uta stansburiana: a population-level comparative analysis.
    Corl A; Davis AR; Kuchta SR; Comendant T; Sinervo B
    Evolution; 2010 Jan; 64(1):79-96. PubMed ID: 19659598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolution of male and female genitalia following release from sexual selection.
    Cayetano L; Maklakov AA; Brooks RC; Bonduriansky R
    Evolution; 2011 Aug; 65(8):2171-83. PubMed ID: 21790567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual selection and the evolution of secondary sexual traits: sex comb evolution in Drosophila.
    Snook RR; Gidaszewski NA; Chapman T; Simmons LW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Apr; 26(4):912-8. PubMed ID: 23496332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluctuating selection strength and intense male competition underlie variation and exaggeration of a water strider's male weapon.
    Toubiana W; Khila A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Apr; 286(1901):20182400. PubMed ID: 30991924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.