These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22276642)
1. Template-based synoptic reports improve the quality of pathology reports of prostatectomy specimens. Aumann K; Amann D; Gumpp V; Hauschke D; Kayser G; May AM; Wetterauer U; Werner M Histopathology; 2012 Mar; 60(4):634-44. PubMed ID: 22276642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radical prostatectomy specimens among Medicare patients in New York State: a review of pathologists' reports. Imperato PJ; Waisman J; Nenner RP Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):966-71. PubMed ID: 9822124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structured reporting ensures complete content and quick detection of essential data in pathology reports of oncological breast resection specimens. Aumann K; Niermann K; Asberger J; Wellner U; Bronsert P; Erbes T; Hauschke D; Stickeler E; Gitsch G; Kayser G; Werner M Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Apr; 156(3):495-500. PubMed ID: 27059032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. International society of urological pathology consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Egevad L; Srigley JR; Delahunt B Adv Anat Pathol; 2011 Jul; 18(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 21654361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens. Evans AJ; Henry PC; Van der Kwast TH; Tkachuk DC; Watson K; Lockwood GA; Fleshner NE; Cheung C; Belanger EC; Amin MB; Boccon-Gibod L; Bostwick DG; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Grignon DJ; Jones EC; Montironi R; Moussa M; Sweet JM; Trpkov K; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18708939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of the pathologist in the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. Ekici S; Ayhan A; Erkan I; Bakkaloğlu M; Ozen H Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2003; 37(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 14594686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of pT2 subdivisions in the TNM staging system for prostate cancer. Hong SK; Han BK; Chung JS; Park DS; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Choe G; Lee SE BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(9):1092-6. PubMed ID: 18671786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The quality of surgical pathology care for men undergoing radical prostatectomy in the U.S. Miller DC; Spencer BA; Shah RB; Ritchey J; Stewart AK; Gay EG; Dunn RL; Wei JT; Litwin MS Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2445-53. PubMed ID: 17492683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database. Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL; J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins. Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens. Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Incidental prostate cancer: volume, location and degree of differentiation of the tumor in the radical prostatectomy specimen and value of subclassification to stage A1 and A2]. Voges GE; McNeal JE; Stamey TA Urologe A; 1991 Nov; 30(6):401-9. PubMed ID: 1722922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The correlation among the percentage of positive biopsy cores from the dominant side of prostate, adverse pathology, and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Memis A; Ugurlu O; Ozden C; Oztekin CV; Aktas BK; Akdemir AO Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2011 Aug; 27(8):307-13. PubMed ID: 21802641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histopathological prostate cancer characteristics at radical prostatectomy after population based screening. Hoedemaeker RF; Rietbergen JB; Kranse R; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 10893598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The prognostic role of the pathological T2 subclassification for prostate cancer in the 2002 Tumour-Nodes-Metastasis staging system. van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Kok DE; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 18336608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of modern pathological criteria for positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens and their use for predicting biochemical recurrence. Bong GW; Ritenour CW; Osunkoya AO; Smith MT; Keane TE BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 19007381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: biochemical outcome. Kawamorita N; Saito S; Ishidoya S; Ito A; Saito H; Kato M; Arai Y Int J Urol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):733-8. PubMed ID: 19674167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]