These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22278839)
21. Evaluation of the Xpert Clostridium difficile assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. Shin S; Kim M; Kim M; Lim H; Kim H; Lee K; Chong Y Ann Lab Med; 2012 Sep; 32(5):355-8. PubMed ID: 22950071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile: real-time PCR detection of toxin genes in faecal samples is more sensitive compared to toxigenic culture. Jensen MB; Olsen KE; Nielsen XC; Hoegh AM; Dessau RB; Atlung T; Engberg J Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Apr; 34(4):727-36. PubMed ID: 25421216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections. Lalande V; Barrault L; Wadel S; Eckert C; Petit JC; Barbut F J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Jul; 49(7):2714-6. PubMed ID: 21525213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A multiplex, internally controlled real-time PCR assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile and identification of hypervirulent strain 027/ST-1. Hoegh AM; Nielsen JB; Lester A; Friis-Møller A; Schønning K Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Jun; 31(6):1073-9. PubMed ID: 21938539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B by Use of Automated Single-Molecule Counting Technology. Sandlund J; Bartolome A; Almazan A; Tam S; Biscocho S; Abusali S; Bishop JJ; Nolan N; Estis J; Todd J; Young S; Senchyna F; Banaei N J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Nov; 56(11):. PubMed ID: 30158195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Multicenter evaluation of the Quidel Lyra Direct C. difficile nucleic acid amplification assay. Beck ET; Buchan BW; Riebe KM; Alkins BR; Pancholi P; Granato PA; Ledeboer NA J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Jun; 52(6):1998-2002. PubMed ID: 24671790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Role of fecal Clostridium difficile load in discrepancies between toxin tests and PCR: is quantitation the next step in C. difficile testing? Leslie JL; Cohen SH; Solnick JV; Polage CR Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Dec; 31(12):3295-9. PubMed ID: 22814877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rapid Simultaneous Molecular Stool-Based Detection of Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile by Quantitative TaqMan Real-Time PCR Assay. Kouhsari E; Douraghi M; Barati M; Yaseri HF; Talebi M; Abbasian S; Moqarabzadeh V; Amirmozafari N Clin Lab; 2019 Apr; 65(4):. PubMed ID: 30969066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection. Kvach EJ; Ferguson D; Riska PF; Landry ML J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 19864479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Algorithm combining toxin immunoassay and stool culture for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. Shin BM; Kuak EY; Lee EJ; Songer JG J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 47(9):2952-6. PubMed ID: 19625481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of antigen and two molecular methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins. Ylisiurua P; Koskela M; Vainio O; Tuokko H Scand J Infect Dis; 2013 Jan; 45(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22998479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative evaluation of the STANDARD M10 and Xpert Lee H-W; Yu H-J; Kim H; Yun SA; Suh E; Kang M; Kim TY; Huh HJ; Lee NY J Clin Microbiol; 2024 Jul; 62(7):e0052424. PubMed ID: 38934589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. High Agreement Between an Ultrasensitive Clostridioides difficile Toxin Assay and a C. difficile Laboratory Algorithm Utilizing GDH-and-Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays and Cytotoxin Testing. Landry ML; Topal JE; Estis J; Katzenbach P; Nolan N; Sandlund J J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Jan; 58(2):. PubMed ID: 31776192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the xpert Clostridium difficile assay and its comparison with the toxin A/B enzyme-linked fluorescent assay and in-house real-time PCR assay used for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile. Whang DH; Joo SY J Clin Lab Anal; 2014 Mar; 28(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 24395702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Investigation of toxin genes of Clostridium difficile strains isolated from hospitalized patients with diarrhoea at Marmara University Hospital]. Deniz U; Ulger N; Aksu B; Karavuş M; Söyletir G Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Jan; 45(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21341153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches. Tenover FC; Novak-Weekley S; Woods CW; Peterson LR; Davis T; Schreckenberger P; Fang FC; Dascal A; Gerding DN; Nomura JH; Goering RV; Akerlund T; Weissfeld AS; Baron EJ; Wong E; Marlowe EM; Whitmore J; Persing DH J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Oct; 48(10):3719-24. PubMed ID: 20702676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Indeterminate tcdB using a Clostridium difficile PCR assay: a retrospective cohort study. Leis JA; Gold WL; Ng J; Hirji Z; Pillai DR; Broukhanski G; Raggiunti P; Hota S; McGeer A; Poutanen SM BMC Infect Dis; 2013 Jul; 13():324. PubMed ID: 23865713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of a commercial real-time PCR assay for tcdB detection to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay and toxigenic culture for direct detection of toxin-producing Clostridium difficile in clinical samples. Stamper PD; Alcabasa R; Aird D; Babiker W; Wehrlin J; Ikpeama I; Carroll KC J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 47(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 19073875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of cobas® Liat® Cdiff, STANDARD™ M10 C. difficile and Xpert® C. difficile BT assays for rapid detection of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile. Suominen J; Korhonen S; Kutvonen H; Jarva H; Pätäri-Sampo A; Loginov R J Microbiol Methods; 2024 Nov; 226():107043. PubMed ID: 39277020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B. Savolainen R; Koskinen JM; Mentula S; Koskinen JO; Kaukoranta SS J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(4):. PubMed ID: 31941691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]