These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22278839)
41. Performance comparison of the cobas Liat and Cepheid GeneXpert systems for Clostridium difficile detection. Granato PA; Hansen G; Herding E; Chaudhuri S; Tang S; Garg SK; Rowell CR; Sickler JJ PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200498. PubMed ID: 30040852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Development and clinical validation of an automated cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay for detecting Clostridioides difficile toxins in clinically relevant stools samples. Elfassy A; Kalina WV; French R; Nguyen H; Tan C; Sebastian S; Wilcox MH; Davies K; Kutzler MA; Jansen KU; Anderson A; Pride MW Anaerobe; 2021 Oct; 71():102415. PubMed ID: 34298152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Clostridium difficile infection diagnosis in a paediatric population: comparison of methodologies. Hart J; Putsathit P; Knight DR; Sammels L; Riley TV; Keil A Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2014 Sep; 33(9):1555-64. PubMed ID: 24781004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of a novel molecular assay to diagnose toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile. Eckert C; Devallière T; Syed-Zaidi R; Lalande V; Barbut F Anaerobe; 2018 Aug; 52():111-114. PubMed ID: 29936109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Genomic and phenotypic studies among Meléndez-Sánchez D; Hernández L; Ares M; Méndez Tenorio A; Flores-Luna L; Torres J; Camorlinga-Ponce M Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jul; 12(7):e0394723. PubMed ID: 38864670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of a real-time PCR for Clostridium difficile toxin A and B genes. de Jong E; de Jong AS; Bartels CJ; van der Rijt-van den Biggelaar C; Melchers WJ; Sturm PD Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Sep; 31(9):2219-25. PubMed ID: 22327373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Development and evaluation of a rapid visual loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the Lin M; Wang P; Lu B; Jin M; Tan J; Liu W; Yuan J; Peng X; Chen Y PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17776. PubMed ID: 39224820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A multi-laboratory comparison of two molecular methods for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. Halstead DC; Abid J; Sloan L; Meza D; Ramsey-Walker D; Hata DJ J Infect Dev Ctries; 2016 Jan; 10(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26829538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. Reller ME; Lema CA; Perl TM; Cai M; Ross TL; Speck KA; Carroll KC J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 45(11):3601-5. PubMed ID: 17804652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Prospective evaluation of the Meridian Illumigene™ loop-mediated amplification assay and the Gen Probe ProGastro™ Cd polymerase chain reaction assay for the direct detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from fecal samples. Doing KM; Hintz MS Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Jan; 72(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 22015321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Evaluation of the new CE-IVD marked BD MAX Cdiff Assay for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile harboring the tcdB gene from clinical stool samples. Verhoeven PO; Carricajo A; Pillet S; Ros A; Fonsale N; Botelho-Nevers E; Lucht F; Berthelot P; Pozzetto B; Grattard F J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Jul; 94(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 23643507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens. Hirvonen JJ; Mentula S; Kaukoranta SS J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 51(9):2908-12. PubMed ID: 23804386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A/B genes by multiplex real-time PCR for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection. Kim H; Jeong SH; Kim M; Lee Y; Lee K J Med Microbiol; 2012 Feb; 61(Pt 2):274-277. PubMed ID: 21959205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of real-time PCR techniques to cytotoxigenic culture methods for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection. Knetsch CW; Bakker D; de Boer RF; Sanders I; Hofs S; Kooistra-Smid AM; Corver J; Eastwood K; Wilcox MH; Kuijper EJ J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Jan; 49(1):227-31. PubMed ID: 20980562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparative performance study of six commercial molecular assays for rapid detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. Paitan Y; Miller-Roll T; Adler A Clin Microbiol Infect; 2017 Aug; 23(8):567-572. PubMed ID: 28223147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: Comparison of Techlab C. diff Quik Chek Complete, Xpert C. difficile, and multistep algorithmic approach. Seo JY; Jeong JH; Kim KH; Ahn JY; Park PW; Seo YH J Clin Lab Anal; 2017 Nov; 31(6):. PubMed ID: 28177534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Study on the features of Li GM; Gu WP; Hou M; Jia SQ; Wang YY; Bai LL; Yin JW; Zhou YM; Fu XQ; Lu JX; Wu Y Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Apr; 44(4):624-628. PubMed ID: 37147836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]