These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22279771)

  • 1. [The threshold for radiation stochastic effects: arguments "pro" and "contra". Applied realization].
    Rozhdestvenskiĭ LM
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2011; 51(5):576-94. PubMed ID: 22279771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Radiobiological analysis of cancerogenic risk values in radioepidemiological investigations].
    Rozhdestvenskiĭ LM
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2008; 48(4):389-408. PubMed ID: 18825986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Pro and contra regarding the threshold/non-threshold mutagenic (carcinogenic) action of low-level ionizing radiation].
    Rozhdestvenskiĭ LM
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2001; 41(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 11721351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model.
    Breckow J
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16468065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation.
    Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Common sense about the linear no-threshold controversy-give the general public a break.
    Leonard BE
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245-6; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low-dose risk assessment.
    Tubiana M; Arengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    Radiat Res; 2007 Jun; 167(6):742-4; author reply 744. PubMed ID: 17523853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of the epidemiological data concerning radiation carcinogenic effects and approaches to the low doses' upper limits determination in the aspect of a threshold of the unhealthy influences of ionizing radiation].
    Rozhdestvenskiĭ LM
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2003; 43(2):227-36. PubMed ID: 12754817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating radiation-induced cancer risks at very low doses: rationale for using a linear no-threshold approach.
    Brenner DJ; Sachs RK
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 16470411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
    Mossman KL
    Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose-effect relationships, epidemiological analysis and the derivation of low dose risk.
    Leenhouts HP; Chadwick KH
    J Radiol Prot; 2011 Mar; 31(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 21346287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cancer incidence and mortality after low-dose radiation exposure: epidemiological aspects].
    Vaĭserman A; Mekhova LV; Koshel' NM; Voĭtenko VP
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2010; 50(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 21434396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Database of radiogenic cancer in experimental animals exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation.
    Duport P; Jiang H; Shilnikova NS; Krewski D; Zielinski JM
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2012; 15(3):186-209. PubMed ID: 22458255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Some statistical implications of dose uncertainty in radiation dose-response analyses.
    Schafer DW; Gilbert ES
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):303-12. PubMed ID: 16808615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):245-51. PubMed ID: 16468064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Environmental standards for ionizing radiation: theoretical basis for dose-response curves.
    Upton AC
    Environ Health Perspect; 1983 Oct; 52():31-9. PubMed ID: 6653536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Carcinogenic effects of low-level ionizing radiation: problems and prospects.
    Upton AC
    In Vivo; 2002; 16(6):527-33. PubMed ID: 12494897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biological effects of low level exposures to ionizing radiation: theory and practice.
    Liu SZ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 20332172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
    Scott BR
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modeling the effects of biologically incorporated radionuclides and chronic low-dose ionizing radiation exposure on both cancer and chronic non-cancer diseases.
    Manton KG; Kulminski A; Akushevich I; Kravchenko J
    Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2006; 46(6):675-86. PubMed ID: 17323695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.