These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22280324)

  • 1. Inadvertent advocacy.
    Wilhere GF
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 22280324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of scientists in statutory interpretation of the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Wilhere GF
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):252-260. PubMed ID: 27601227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Science, policy advocacy, and marine protected areas.
    Gray NJ; Campbell LM
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):460-8. PubMed ID: 19016824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How research-prioritization exercises affect conservation policy.
    Rudd MA
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Oct; 25(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 21790784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conservation planning for species recovery under the Endangered Species Act: A case study with the Northern Spotted Owl.
    Dunk JR; Woodbridge B; Schumaker N; Glenn EM; White B; LaPlante DW; Anthony RG; Davis RJ; Halupka K; Henson P; Marcot BG; Merola-Zwartjes M; Noon BR; Raphael MG; Caicco J; Hansen DL; Mazurek MJ; Thrailkill J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210643. PubMed ID: 30640947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The route to best science in implementation of the Endangered Species Act's consultation mandate: the benefits of structured effects analysis.
    Murphy DD; Weiland PS
    Environ Manage; 2011 Feb; 47(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 21161526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geography and recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Carroll C; Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Rohlf DJ; Phillips MK
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 20151988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Valuing improvements to threatened and endangered marine species: an application of stated preference choice experiments.
    Wallmo K; Lew DK
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Jul; 92(7):1793-801. PubMed ID: 21392881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulating scientific research: should scientists be left alone?
    Intemann KK; de Melo-Martín I
    FASEB J; 2008 Mar; 22(3):654-8. PubMed ID: 17928363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.
    Himes Boor GK
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Credibility and advocacy in conservation science.
    Horton CC; Peterson TR; Banerjee P; Peterson MJ
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 26041036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Indicators of sustainability: challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy.
    McCool SF; Stankey GH
    Environ Manage; 2004 Mar; 33(3):294-305. PubMed ID: 15031759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bioethics Symposium: The ethical food movement: What does it mean for the role of science and scientists in current debates about animal agriculture?
    Croney CC; Apley M; Capper JL; Mench JA; Priest S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 May; 90(5):1570-82. PubMed ID: 22573840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Species inequality in scientific study.
    Trimble MJ; Van Aarde RJ
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Jun; 24(3):886-90. PubMed ID: 20184651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biodiversity conservation and indigenous land management in the era of self-determination.
    Schmidt PM; Peterson MJ
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1458-66. PubMed ID: 19508673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Researchers must be aware of their roles at the interface of ecosystem services science and policy.
    Crouzat E; Arpin I; Brunet L; Colloff MJ; Turkelboom F; Lavorel S
    Ambio; 2018 Feb; 47(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 28913614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defending the scientific integrity of conservation-policy processes.
    Carroll C; Hartl B; Goldman GT; Rohlf DJ; Treves A; Kerr JT; Ritchie EG; Kingsford RT; Gibbs KE; Maron M; Watson JEM
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):967-975. PubMed ID: 28741747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Science, scientists, and policy advocacy.
    Lackey RT
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17298504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Priorities for improving the scientific foundation of conservation policy in North America.
    Noss RF; Fleishman E; Dellasala DA; Fitzgerald JM; Gross MR; Main MB; Nagle F; O'Malley SL; Rosales J
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Aug; 23(4):825-33. PubMed ID: 19627314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The normative dimension and legal meaning of endangered and recovery in the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
    Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Phillips MK
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1383-90. PubMed ID: 17002756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.