221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22280324)
1. Inadvertent advocacy.
Wilhere GF
Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 22280324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of scientists in statutory interpretation of the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Wilhere GF
Conserv Biol; 2017 Apr; 31(2):252-260. PubMed ID: 27601227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Science, policy advocacy, and marine protected areas.
Gray NJ; Campbell LM
Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):460-8. PubMed ID: 19016824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How research-prioritization exercises affect conservation policy.
Rudd MA
Conserv Biol; 2011 Oct; 25(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 21790784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conservation planning for species recovery under the Endangered Species Act: A case study with the Northern Spotted Owl.
Dunk JR; Woodbridge B; Schumaker N; Glenn EM; White B; LaPlante DW; Anthony RG; Davis RJ; Halupka K; Henson P; Marcot BG; Merola-Zwartjes M; Noon BR; Raphael MG; Caicco J; Hansen DL; Mazurek MJ; Thrailkill J
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210643. PubMed ID: 30640947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The route to best science in implementation of the Endangered Species Act's consultation mandate: the benefits of structured effects analysis.
Murphy DD; Weiland PS
Environ Manage; 2011 Feb; 47(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 21161526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geography and recovery under the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Carroll C; Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Rohlf DJ; Phillips MK
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 20151988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Valuing improvements to threatened and endangered marine species: an application of stated preference choice experiments.
Wallmo K; Lew DK
J Environ Manage; 2011 Jul; 92(7):1793-801. PubMed ID: 21392881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulating scientific research: should scientists be left alone?
Intemann KK; de Melo-MartÃn I
FASEB J; 2008 Mar; 22(3):654-8. PubMed ID: 17928363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A framework for developing objective and measurable recovery criteria for threatened and endangered species.
Himes Boor GK
Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 24112040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Credibility and advocacy in conservation science.
Horton CC; Peterson TR; Banerjee P; Peterson MJ
Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 26041036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Indicators of sustainability: challenges and opportunities at the interface of science and policy.
McCool SF; Stankey GH
Environ Manage; 2004 Mar; 33(3):294-305. PubMed ID: 15031759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioethics Symposium: The ethical food movement: What does it mean for the role of science and scientists in current debates about animal agriculture?
Croney CC; Apley M; Capper JL; Mench JA; Priest S
J Anim Sci; 2012 May; 90(5):1570-82. PubMed ID: 22573840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Species inequality in scientific study.
Trimble MJ; Van Aarde RJ
Conserv Biol; 2010 Jun; 24(3):886-90. PubMed ID: 20184651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biodiversity conservation and indigenous land management in the era of self-determination.
Schmidt PM; Peterson MJ
Conserv Biol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):1458-66. PubMed ID: 19508673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Researchers must be aware of their roles at the interface of ecosystem services science and policy.
Crouzat E; Arpin I; Brunet L; Colloff MJ; Turkelboom F; Lavorel S
Ambio; 2018 Feb; 47(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 28913614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Defending the scientific integrity of conservation-policy processes.
Carroll C; Hartl B; Goldman GT; Rohlf DJ; Treves A; Kerr JT; Ritchie EG; Kingsford RT; Gibbs KE; Maron M; Watson JEM
Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):967-975. PubMed ID: 28741747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Science, scientists, and policy advocacy.
Lackey RT
Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 17298504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Priorities for improving the scientific foundation of conservation policy in North America.
Noss RF; Fleishman E; Dellasala DA; Fitzgerald JM; Gross MR; Main MB; Nagle F; O'Malley SL; Rosales J
Conserv Biol; 2009 Aug; 23(4):825-33. PubMed ID: 19627314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The normative dimension and legal meaning of endangered and recovery in the U.S. Endangered Species Act.
Vucetich JA; Nelson MP; Phillips MK
Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1383-90. PubMed ID: 17002756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
