These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22280324)

  • 21. Leadership: a new frontier in conservation science.
    Manolis JC; Chan KM; Finkelstein ME; Stephens S; Nelson CR; Grant JB; Dombeck MP
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Aug; 23(4):879-86. PubMed ID: 19183215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conservation as virtue: a scientific and social process for conservation ethics.
    Van Houtan KS
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1367-72. PubMed ID: 17002754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On advocacy by environmental scientists: what, whether, why, and how.
    Nelson MP; Vucetich JA
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Oct; 23(5):1090-101. PubMed ID: 19459889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Overestimation of fire risk in the northern spotted owl recovery plan.
    Hanson CT; Odion DC; DellaSala DA; Baker WL
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Oct; 23(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 19549218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Actual and potential use of population viability analyses in recovery of plant species listed under the US endangered species act.
    Zeigler SL; Che-Castaldo JP; Neel MC
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1265-78. PubMed ID: 24033732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The case for policy-relevant conservation science.
    Rose DC
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):748-54. PubMed ID: 25545991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reasons scientists avoid thinking about ethics.
    Wolpe PR
    Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(6):1023-5. PubMed ID: 16777590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.
    Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S
    J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Scientist and policy-maker response types and times in suburban watersheds.
    Wolosoff SE; Endreny TA
    Environ Manage; 2002 Jun; 29(6):729-35. PubMed ID: 11992167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Addressing climate change threats to endangered species in U.S. recovery plans.
    Povilitis A; Suckling K
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):372-6. PubMed ID: 20184656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Honest advocacy for nature: presenting a persuasive narrative for conservation.
    Rose DC; Brotherton PNM; Owens S; Pryke T
    Biodivers Conserv; 2018; 27(7):1703-1723. PubMed ID: 31007418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How scientists view the public, the media and the political process.
    Besley JC; Nisbet M
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Aug; 22(6):644-59. PubMed ID: 23885050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The relationship between environmental advocacy, values, and science: a survey of ecological scientists' attitudes.
    Reiners DS; Reiners WA; Lockwood JA
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1226-42. PubMed ID: 23967588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Scientific integrity in recovery planning and risk assessment: comment on Wilhere.
    Carroll C; Rohlf DJ; Noon BR; Reed JM
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Aug; 26(4):743-5; discussion 746-8. PubMed ID: 22809355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of public information in ecology and conservation: an emphasis on inadvertent social information.
    Blanchet S; Clobert J; Danchin E
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2010 May; 1195():149-68. PubMed ID: 20536822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimizing allocation of management resources for wildlife.
    Marsh H; Dennis A; Hines H; Kutt A; McDonald K; Weber E; Williams S; Winter J
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):387-99. PubMed ID: 17391189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Scientists' political behaviors are not driven by individual-level government benefits.
    Zhang B; Mildenberger M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0230961. PubMed ID: 32374737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The endangered species act: science, policy, and politics.
    Bean MJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Apr; 1162():369-91. PubMed ID: 19432657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Are comparative studies of extinction risk useful for conservation?
    Cardillo M; Meijaard E
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2012 Mar; 27(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 22024663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
    Schor EL;
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.