213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22280603)
1. Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.
Helms Tillery K; Brown CA; Bacon SP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):416-23. PubMed ID: 22280603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Gifford RH; Stecker GC
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influences of noise-interruption and information-bearing acoustic changes on understanding simulated electric-acoustic speech.
Stilp C; Donaldson G; Oh S; Kong YY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Nov; 140(5):3971. PubMed ID: 27908030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.
Hazrati O; Sadjadi SO; Loizou PC; Hansen JH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3759-65. PubMed ID: 24180786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of speech degradation on top-down repair: phonemic restoration with simulations of cochlear implants and combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
Başkent D
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 13(5):683-92. PubMed ID: 22569838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of adaptive dynamic range optimization in adverse listening conditions for cochlear implants.
Ali H; Hazrati O; Tobey EA; Hansen JH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):EL242. PubMed ID: 25190428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations.
Poissant SF; Whitmal NA; Freyman RL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1606-15. PubMed ID: 16583905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [On the effect of reverberation on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners].
Mühler R; Ziese M; Rostalski D; Verhey JL
HNO; 2014 Jan; 62(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 24270967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults.
Wróblewski M; Lewis DE; Valente DL; Stelmachowicz PG
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 22732772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simulation study of harmonics regeneration in noise reduction for electric and acoustic stimulation.
Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3145-53. PubMed ID: 21117763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A deep learning based segregation algorithm to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in reverberant-noisy conditions.
Zhao Y; Wang D; Johnson EM; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):1627. PubMed ID: 30424625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
Zeng FG; Liu S
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A dissociation between speech understanding and perceived reverberation.
Ellis GM; Zahorik P
Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 379():52-58. PubMed ID: 31075611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners.
Hazrati O; Loizou PC
Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 22356300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
