These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22280612)

  • 1. Changing only the probability that spoken words will be distorted changes how they are recognized.
    McQueen JM; Huettig F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):509-17. PubMed ID: 22280612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic masking disrupts time-dependent mechanisms of memory encoding in word-list recall.
    Cousins KA; Dar H; Wingfield A; Miller P
    Mem Cognit; 2014 May; 42(4):622-38. PubMed ID: 24838269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Infant perceptual development for faces and spoken words: an integrated approach.
    Watson TL; Robbins RA; Best CT
    Dev Psychobiol; 2014 Nov; 56(7):1454-81. PubMed ID: 25132626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rime Priming Effects in Spoken Word Recognition.
    Dufour S; Mirault J; Grainger J
    Exp Psychol; 2023 Nov; 70(6):336-343. PubMed ID: 38288915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of irrelevant unintelligible and intelligible background speech on spoken language production.
    He J; Frances C; Creemers A; Brehm L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; ():17470218231219971. PubMed ID: 38044368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech Sound Categories Affect Lexical Competition: Implications for Analytic Auditory Training.
    Hendrickson K; Bay K; Combiths P; Foody M; Walker E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Apr; 67(4):1281-1289. PubMed ID: 38517230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Encoding speech rate in challenging listening conditions: White noise and reverberation.
    Reinisch E; Bosker HR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2303-2318. PubMed ID: 35996057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One Size Does Not Fit All: Examining the Effects of Working Memory Capacity on Spoken Word Recognition in Older Adults Using Eye Tracking.
    Nitsan G; Banai K; Ben-David BM
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():841466. PubMed ID: 35478743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulation of Cross-Language Activation During Bilingual Auditory Word Recognition: Effects of Language Experience but Not Competing Background Noise.
    Fricke M
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():674157. PubMed ID: 35282207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Presence of Background Noise Extends the Competitor Space in Native and Non-Native Spoken-Word Recognition: Insights from Computational Modeling.
    Karaminis T; Hintz F; Scharenborg O
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Feb; 46(2):e13110. PubMed ID: 35188686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glottal stops do not constrain lexical access as do oral stops.
    Mitterer H; Kim S; Cho T
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259573. PubMed ID: 34797821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gradient activation of speech categories facilitates listeners' recovery from lexical garden paths, but not perception of speech-in-noise.
    Kapnoula EC; Edwards J; McMurray B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Apr; 47(4):578-595. PubMed ID: 33983791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do Musicians and Non-musicians Differ in Speech-on-Speech Processing?
    Kaplan EC; Wagner AE; Toffanin P; Başkent D
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():623787. PubMed ID: 33679539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre- and post-target cortical processes predict speech-in-noise performance.
    Kim S; Schwalje AT; Liu AS; Gander PE; McMurray B; Griffiths TD; Choi I
    Neuroimage; 2021 Mar; 228():117699. PubMed ID: 33387631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Degree of Language Experience Modulates Visual Attention to Visible Speech and Iconic Gestures During Clear and Degraded Speech Comprehension.
    Drijvers L; Vaitonytė J; Özyürek A
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Oct; 43(10):e12789. PubMed ID: 31621126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in Working Memory Capacity Affect Online Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence From Eye Movements.
    Nitsan G; Wingfield A; Lavie L; Ben-David BM
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519839624. PubMed ID: 31010398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.
    McMurray B; Ellis TP; Apfelbaum KS
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):961-980. PubMed ID: 30531260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Training-induced pattern-specific phonetic adjustments by first and second language listeners.
    Cooper A; Bradlow A
    J Phon; 2018 May; 68():32-49. PubMed ID: 30270945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.
    Van Engen KJ; McLaughlin DJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():56-66. PubMed ID: 29801981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lexical-Access Ability and Cognitive Predictors of Speech Recognition in Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Kaandorp MW; Smits C; Merkus P; Festen JM; Goverts ST
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517743887. PubMed ID: 29205095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.