These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22280875)
1. A genetic animal model of differential sensitivity to methamphetamine reinforcement. Shabani S; Dobbs LK; Ford MM; Mark GP; Finn DA; Phillips TJ Neuropharmacology; 2012 Jun; 62(7):2169-77. PubMed ID: 22280875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methamphetamine-alcohol interactions in murine models of sequential and simultaneous oral drug-taking. Fultz EK; Martin DL; Hudson CN; Kippin TE; Szumlinski KK Drug Alcohol Depend; 2017 Aug; 177():178-186. PubMed ID: 28601731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-genetic factors that influence methamphetamine intake in a genetic model of differential methamphetamine consumption. Stafford AM; Reed C; Phillips TJ Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2020 Nov; 237(11):3315-3336. PubMed ID: 32833064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Opioid sensitivity in mice selectively bred to consume or not consume methamphetamine. Eastwood EC; Phillips TJ Addict Biol; 2014 May; 19(3):370-9. PubMed ID: 23145527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The motivational valence of methamphetamine relates inversely to subsequent methamphetamine self-administration in female C57BL/6J mice. Shab G; Fultz EK; Page A; Coelho MA; Brewin LW; Stailey N; Brown CN; Bryant CD; Kippin TE; Szumlinski KK Behav Brain Res; 2021 Feb; 398():112959. PubMed ID: 33053382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methamphetamine drinking microstructure in mice bred to drink high or low amounts of methamphetamine. Eastwood EC; Barkley-Levenson AM; Phillips TJ Behav Brain Res; 2014 Oct; 272():111-20. PubMed ID: 24978098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Behavioral inhibition in mice bred for high vs. low levels of methamphetamine consumption or sensitization. Moschak TM; Stang KA; Phillips TJ; Mitchell SH Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2012 Jul; 222(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 22311384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impaired memory and reduced sensitivity to the circadian period lengthening effects of methamphetamine in mice selected for high methamphetamine consumption. Olsen RH; Allen CN; Derkach VA; Phillips TJ; Belknap JK; Raber J Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():197-204. PubMed ID: 23954232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of adenosine receptor subtypes in methamphetamine reward and reinforcement. Kavanagh KA; Schreiner DC; Levis SC; O'Neill CE; Bachtell RK Neuropharmacology; 2015 Feb; 89():265-73. PubMed ID: 25301277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Profound reduction in sensitivity to the aversive effects of methamphetamine in mice bred for high methamphetamine intake. Shabani S; McKinnon CS; Cunningham CL; Phillips TJ Neuropharmacology; 2012 Feb; 62(2):1134-41. PubMed ID: 22118879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of systemic pretreatment with the NAALADase inhibitor 2-PMPA on oral methamphetamine reinforcement in C57BL/6J mice. Fultz EK; Nei AYT; Chi JC; Lichter JN; Szumlinski KK Front Psychiatry; 2024; 15():1297275. PubMed ID: 38638417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Depression-like symptoms of withdrawal in a genetic mouse model of binge methamphetamine intake. Shabani S; Schmidt B; Ghimire B; Houlton SK; Hellmuth L; Mojica E; Phillips TJ Genes Brain Behav; 2019 Mar; 18(3):e12533. PubMed ID: 30375183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A breeding strategy to identify modifiers of high genetic risk for methamphetamine intake. Reed C; Stafford AM; Mootz JRK; Baba H; Erk J; Phillips TJ Genes Brain Behav; 2021 Feb; 20(2):e12667. PubMed ID: 32424970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Operant sensation seeking in the mouse. Olsen CM; Winder DG J Vis Exp; 2010 Nov; (45):. PubMed ID: 21113110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unique genetic factors influence sensitivity to the rewarding and aversive effects of methamphetamine versus cocaine. Gubner NR; Reed C; McKinnon CS; Phillips TJ Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():420-7. PubMed ID: 23994231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Qualitative differences between C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice in morphine potentiation of brain stimulation reward and intravenous self-administration. Elmer GI; Pieper JO; Hamilton LR; Wise RA Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2010 Feb; 208(2):309-21. PubMed ID: 20013116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]