These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22281127)

  • 61. Consumer awareness and interest toward sodium reduction trends in Korea.
    Kim MK; Lee KG
    J Food Sci; 2014 Jul; 79(7):S1416-23. PubMed ID: 24975166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints.
    van Herpen E; Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 21554909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Influence of front-of-package nutrition labels on beverage healthiness perceptions: Results from a randomized experiment.
    Acton RB; Vanderlee L; Hammond D
    Prev Med; 2018 Oct; 115():83-89. PubMed ID: 30145345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Pilot randomized controlled trial testing the influence of front-of-pack sugar warning labels on food demand.
    Ang FJL; Agrawal S; Finkelstein EA
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):164. PubMed ID: 30732609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The effects of voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labels on volume shares of products: the case of the Dutch Choices.
    Smed S; Edenbrandt AK; Jansen L
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Oct; 22(15):2879-2890. PubMed ID: 31232256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Single-larger-portion-size and dual-column nutrition labeling may help consumers make more healthful food choices.
    Lando AM; Lo SC
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2013 Feb; 113(2):241-50. PubMed ID: 23351627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Food Choice Under Five Front-of-Package Nutrition Label Conditions: An Experimental Study Across 12 Countries.
    Talati Z; Egnell M; Hercberg S; Julia C; Pettigrew S
    Am J Public Health; 2019 Dec; 109(12):1770-1775. PubMed ID: 31622139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Do Health Claims and Front-of-Pack Labels Lead to a Positivity Bias in Unhealthy Foods?
    Talati Z; Pettigrew S; Dixon H; Neal B; Ball K; Hughes C
    Nutrients; 2016 Dec; 8(12):. PubMed ID: 27918426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Consumers' purchase decisions for products with nutrition and health claims: What role do product category and gaze duration on claims play?
    Steinhauser J; Janssen M; Hamm U
    Appetite; 2019 Oct; 141():104337. PubMed ID: 31260708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Submissions to the Australian and New Zealand Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy support traffic light nutrition labelling.
    White J; Signal L
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2012 Oct; 36(5):446-51. PubMed ID: 23025366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Traffic Light System Can Increase Healthfulness Perception: Implications for Policy Making.
    Machín L; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Giménez A; Ares G
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2018; 50(7):668-674. PubMed ID: 29627330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Can nutritional information modify purchase of ultra-processed products? Results from a simulated online shopping experiment.
    Machín L; Arrúa A; Giménez A; Curutchet MR; Martínez J; Ares G
    Public Health Nutr; 2018 Jan; 21(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 28716163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Dietary sodium reduction in New Zealand: influence of the Tick label.
    Ning SX; Mainvil LA; Thomson RK; McLean RM
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2017; 26(6):1133-1138. PubMed ID: 28917241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Dual-process theory and consumer response to front-of-package nutrition label formats.
    Sanjari SS; Jahn S; Boztug Y
    Nutr Rev; 2017 Nov; 75(11):871-882. PubMed ID: 29069484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Front-of-pack health imagery on both 'healthy' and 'unhealthy' foods leads people to misremember seeing health claims: Two memory experiments.
    Delivett CP; Farrow CV; Thomas JM; Nash RA
    Appetite; 2022 Jul; 174():106013. PubMed ID: 35367294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The new food label, type of fat, and consumer choice. A pilot study.
    Hrovat KB; Harris KZ; Leach AD; Russell BS; Harris BV; Sprecher DL
    Arch Fam Med; 1994 Aug; 3(8):690-5. PubMed ID: 7952255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Consumer awareness of salt and sodium reduction and sodium labeling.
    Kim MK; Lopetcharat K; Gerard PD; Drake MA
    J Food Sci; 2012 Sep; 77(9):S307-13. PubMed ID: 22957915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Facts up front versus traffic light food labels: a randomized controlled trial.
    Roberto CA; Bragg MA; Schwartz MB; Seamans MJ; Musicus A; Novak N; Brownell KD
    Am J Prev Med; 2012 Aug; 43(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 22813677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Behavioural effects of directive cues on front-of-package nutrition information: the combination matters!
    Koenigstorfer J; Wąsowicz-Kiryło G; Styśko-Kunkowska M; Groeppel-Klein A
    Public Health Nutr; 2014 Sep; 17(9):2115-21. PubMed ID: 23954043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Effects of front-of-package and shelf nutrition labeling systems on consumers.
    Hersey JC; Wohlgenant KC; Arsenault JE; Kosa KM; Muth MK
    Nutr Rev; 2013 Jan; 71(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 23282247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.