These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22282259)
21. Nonparametric evaluation of quantitative traits in population-based association studies when the genetic model is unknown. Konietschke F; Libiger O; Hothorn LA PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31242. PubMed ID: 22363593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. RETR_PWR: an SAS macro for retrospective statistical power analysis. Hogarty KY; Kromrey JD Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 Nov; 35(4):585-9. PubMed ID: 14748502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Computer program for the parametric and nonparametric comparison of several groups to a control. Blaker WD Comput Biol Med; 1987; 17(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 3816163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Do we always correctly interpret the results of statistical nonparametric tests]. Moczko JA Przegl Lek; 2014; 71(11):654-8. PubMed ID: 25799864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Simple bootstrap statistical inference using the SAS system. Cole SR Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1999 Jul; 60(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 10430465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. SPSS and SAS programming for the testing of mediation models. Dudley WN; Benuzillo JG; Carrico MS Nurs Res; 2004; 53(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 14726778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Researcher degrees of freedom in statistical software contribute to unreliable results: A comparison of nonparametric analyses conducted in SPSS, SAS, Stata, and R. Hodges CB; Stone BM; Johnson PK; Carter JH; Sawyers CK; Roby PR; Lindsey HM Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2813-2837. PubMed ID: 35953660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A distribution-free procedure for testing versatile alternative in medical multisample comparison studies. Mukherjee A; Kössler W; Marozzi M Stat Med; 2022 Jul; 41(16):2978-3002. PubMed ID: 35403240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method. Dwivedi AK; Mallawaarachchi I; Alvarado LA Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2187-2205. PubMed ID: 28276584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A set of SAS macros for calculating and displaying adjusted odds ratios (with confidence intervals) for continuous covariates in logistic B-spline regression models. Gregory M; Ulmer H; Pfeiffer KP; Lang S; Strasak AM Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18603325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A note on power and sample size calculations for the Kruskal-Wallis test for ordered categorical data. Fan C; Zhang D J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1162-73. PubMed ID: 23075015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The evaluation of radioactive microsphere data: remarks on the use of the BMDP and SAS statistical software packages. Schosser R; Gross W; Messmer K Comput Biol Med; 1990; 20(6):445-64. PubMed ID: 2286079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A generalized rank-order method for nonparametric analysis of data from exercise science: a tutorial. Thomas JR; Nelson JK; Thomas KT Res Q Exerc Sport; 1999 Mar; 70(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 10100331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Nonparametric methods for microarray data based on exchangeability and borrowed power. Lee ML; Whitmore GA; Björkbacka H; Freeman MW J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):783-97. PubMed ID: 16078385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Proper handling of correlated data in rehabilitation research]. Kuss O; Watzke S Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2005 Dec; 44(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 16320181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Rank-based permutation approaches for non-parametric factorial designs. Umlauft M; Konietschke F; Pauly M Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):368-390. PubMed ID: 28295183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Towards a web-based decision support tool for selecting appropriate statistical test in medical and biological sciences. Suner A; Karakülah G; Dicle O Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():48-52. PubMed ID: 25160143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo. Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biostatistics Series Module 3: Comparing Groups: Numerical Variables. Hazra A; Gogtay N Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 27293244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. Erceg-Hurn DM; Mirosevich VM Am Psychol; 2008 Oct; 63(7):591-601. PubMed ID: 18855490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]