BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22282466)

  • 1. The use and interpretation of competing risks regression models.
    Dignam JJ; Zhang Q; Kocherginsky M
    Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Apr; 18(8):2301-8. PubMed ID: 22282466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis and design of randomised clinical trials involving competing risks endpoints.
    Tai BC; Wee J; Machin D
    Trials; 2011 May; 12():127. PubMed ID: 21595883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cumulative incidence in competing risks data and competing risks regression analysis.
    Kim HT
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Jan; 13(2 Pt 1):559-65. PubMed ID: 17255278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Competing time-to-event endpoints in cardiology trials: a simulation study to illustrate the importance of an adequate statistical analysis.
    Rauch G; Kieser M; Ulrich S; Doherty P; Rauch B; Schneider S; Riemer T; Senges J
    Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 22964966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating sample size in the presence of competing risks - Cause-specific hazard or cumulative incidence approach?
    Tai BC; Chen ZJ; Machin D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jan; 27(1):114-125. PubMed ID: 26711503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performing Survival Analyses in the Presence of Competing Risks: A Clinical Example in Older Breast Cancer Patients.
    de Glas NA; Kiderlen M; Vandenbroucke JP; de Craen AJ; Portielje JE; van de Velde CJ; Liefers GJ; Bastiaannet E; Le Cessie S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 May; 108(5):. PubMed ID: 26614095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The importance of censoring in competing risks analysis of the subdistribution hazard.
    Donoghoe MW; Gebski V
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28376736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical recommendations for reporting Fine-Gray model analyses for competing risk data.
    Austin PC; Fine JP
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4391-4400. PubMed ID: 28913837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dealing with competing risks: testing covariates and calculating sample size.
    Pintilie M
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(22):3317-24. PubMed ID: 12407674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible competing risks regression modeling and goodness-of-fit.
    Scheike TH; Zhang MJ
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2008 Dec; 14(4):464-83. PubMed ID: 18752067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semiparametric competing risks regression under interval censoring using the R package intccr.
    Park J; Bakoyannis G; Yiannoutsos CT
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 May; 173():167-176. PubMed ID: 31046992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted competing risks analysis: an application on long-term risk of urinary adverse events after prostate cancer treatments.
    Bolch CA; Chu H; Jarosek S; Cole SR; Elliott S; Virnig B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):93. PubMed ID: 28693428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competing risk analyses: how are they different and why should you care?
    Chappell R
    Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Apr; 18(8):2127-9. PubMed ID: 22427347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overestimation of the probability of death on peritoneal dialysis by the Kaplan-Meier method: advantages of a competing risks approach.
    Beuscart JB; Pagniez D; Boulanger E; Lessore de Sainte Foy C; Salleron J; Frimat L; Duhamel A
    BMC Nephrol; 2012 May; 13():31. PubMed ID: 22646159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct likelihood inference and sensitivity analysis for competing risks regression with missing causes of failure.
    Moreno-Betancur M; Rey G; Latouche A
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):498-507. PubMed ID: 25761785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A proportional hazards regression model for the subdistribution with right-censored and left-truncated competing risks data.
    Zhang X; Zhang MJ; Fine J
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(16):1933-51. PubMed ID: 21557288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks.
    Austin PC; Lee DS; Fine JP
    Circulation; 2016 Feb; 133(6):601-9. PubMed ID: 26858290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competing risks and time-dependent covariates.
    Cortese G; Andersen PK
    Biom J; 2010 Feb; 52(1):138-58. PubMed ID: 20029852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modelling two cause-specific hazards of competing risks in one cumulative proportional odds model?
    Ohneberg K; Schumacher M; Beyersmann J
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(27):4353-4363. PubMed ID: 28833435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Choice and interpretation of statistical tests used when competing risks are present.
    Dignam JJ; Kocherginsky MN
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 26(24):4027-34. PubMed ID: 18711194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.