143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22282509)
1. Alternative X-ray filters for an intra-oral digital radiographic system.
Stecke J; Cruz AD; Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jul; 41(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 22282509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative study on radio-opacity of dental composite resin materials'determination using film imaging and digital imaging].
Li Y; Lin H; Zhang TJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 34650308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of pixel values for two photostimulable phosphor plates in consecutive standardized scannings.
Freitas P; Yaedú RY; Rubira-Bullen IR; Escarpinati M; Vieira MC; Schiabel H; Lauris JR
Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 17119702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Equivalent thicknesses of beam hardening filters consisting of aluminium, copper, Al/Cu and Al/Gold combinations and plumbiferous acrylic for 40 to 150 kVp diagnostic spectra.
Homolka P; Figl M
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1269-1283. PubMed ID: 30115815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography.
Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the dynamic range of different X-ray photon detectors in intra-oral radiography. A comparison of image quality in film, charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems.
Borg E; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 9446978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Study of the aluminum-zinc alloy as an alternative method of filtration in dental X-ray devices].
Haiter CF; Bóscolo FN; Haiter Neto F; de Almeida SM
Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2002; 16(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 11938723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Degradation of storage phosphor images due to scanning delay.
Akdeniz BG; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 16549432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Task-specific enhancement filters in storage phosphor images from the Vistascan system for detection of proximal caries lesions of known size.
Haiter-Neto F; Casanova MS; Frydenberg M; Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 19101494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of delayed scanning of storage phosphor plates on occlusal caries detection.
Sogur E; Baksi BG; Mert A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 May; 41(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 22282506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiopacity of resin-based materials measured in film radiographs and storage phosphor plate (Digora).
Sabbagh J; Vreven J; Leloup G
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):677-84. PubMed ID: 15646224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forensic oral imaging quality of hand-held dental X-ray devices: comparison of two image receptors and two devices.
Pittayapat P; Thevissen P; Fieuws S; Jacobs R; Willems G
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jan; 194(1-3):20-7. PubMed ID: 19913377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of conventional and digital radiography systems with regard to radiopacity of root canal filling materials.
Akcay I; Ilhan B; Dundar N
Int Endod J; 2012 Aug; 45(8):730-6. PubMed ID: 22458866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
Doyle P; Finney L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.
Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current practice in conventional and digital intraoral radiography: problems and solutions.
Fuhrmann AW
Int J Comput Dent; 2006 Jan; 9(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 16608054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
