These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22282509)

  • 21. Accuracy of enhancement filters in measuring in vitro peri-implant bone level.
    de Azevedo Vaz SL; Neves FS; Figueirêdo EP; Haiter-Neto F; Campos PS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1074-7. PubMed ID: 22762154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of digital images acquired using different phosphor storage plates (PSPs) subjected to varying reading times and storage conditions.
    Martins MG; Haiter Neto F; Whaites EJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 May; 32(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 12917285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of alternative photostimulable phosphor plates erasing times on subjective digital image quality.
    Melo DP; Dos Anjos Pontual A; de Almeida SM; Campos PS; Alves MC; Tosoni GM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jan; 39(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 20089740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How many times can we use a phosphor plate? A preliminary study.
    Ergün S; Güneri P; Ilgüy D; Ilgüy M; Boyacioglu H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jan; 38(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19114423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The modulation transfer function and signal-to-noise ratio of different digital filters: a technical approach.
    Brüllmann DD; d'Hoedt B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 May; 40(4):222-9. PubMed ID: 21493878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Storage phosphor plates: how durable are they as a digital dental radiographic system?
    Bedard A; Davis TD; Angelopoulos C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):57-69. PubMed ID: 15150634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. X-ray dose reduction using additional copper filtration for abdominal digital radiography: Evaluation using signal difference-to-noise ratio.
    Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Nagasou D; Hattori M
    Phys Med; 2017 Feb; 34():65-71. PubMed ID: 28148466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
    Shrestha S; Vedantham S; Karellas A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of rare-earth filters on patient exposure and image contrast.
    Mauriello SM; Washburn DB; Matteson SR
    J Dent Res; 1987 Aug; 66(8):1326-30. PubMed ID: 3476600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Alternative erasing times of the DenOptix system plate: performance on the detection of proximal caries.
    Melo DP; Pontual AA; Almeida SM; Campos PF; Tosoni GM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 18656395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
    Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of resolution characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic images using a task transfer function.
    Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Tsuru H; Shibayama Y; Kato T; Yoshiura K
    Oral Radiol; 2022 Oct; 38(4):638-644. PubMed ID: 35767125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The use of high-resolution digital imaging technology for small diameter K-file length determination in endodontics.
    Vandenberghe B; Bud M; Sutanto A; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 19452176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of the deterioration of photostimulable phosphor plates.
    Souza-Pinto GN; Santaella GM; Coli AA; Oenning AC; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190500. PubMed ID: 32302219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative study of a wireless digital system and 2 PSP digital systems on proximal caries detection and pixel values.
    dos Anjos Pontual A; de Melo DP; Pontual ML; de Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F
    Gen Dent; 2013; 61(6):56-60. PubMed ID: 24064165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reducing radiation dose by application of optimized low-energy x-ray filters to K-edge imaging with a photon counting detector.
    Choi YN; Lee S; Kim HJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(2):N35-49. PubMed ID: 26733235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis.
    Badano A; Kyprianou IS; Jennings RJ; Sempau J
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4076-91. PubMed ID: 18074617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Guntern D; Verdun FR
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):906-14. PubMed ID: 17441236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A semiempirical linear model of indirect, flat-panel x-ray detectors.
    Huang SY; Yang K; Abbey CK; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2108-18. PubMed ID: 22482632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.