161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22282762)
1. What do microtensile bond strength values of adhesives mean?
Söderholm KJ; Geraldeli S; Shen C
J Adhes Dent; 2012 Aug; 14(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 22282762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new fixation method for stick-shaped specimens in microtensile tests: laboratory tests and FEA.
Lu S; Zhao SJ; Wang WG; Gao Y; Zhang Y; Dou Q; Chen JH
J Adhes Dent; 2013 Dec; 15(6):511-8. PubMed ID: 23593639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of specimen gripping device, geometry and fixation method on microtensile bond strength, failure mode and stress distribution: laboratory and finite element analyses.
Raposo LH; Armstrong SR; Maia RR; Qian F; Geraldeli S; Soares CJ
Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):e50-62. PubMed ID: 22425572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laboratory and FEA evaluation of dentin-to-composite bonding as a function adhesive layer thickness.
Coelho PG; Calamia C; Harsono M; Thompson VP; Silva NR
Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18374973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation between bond strength and nanomechanical properties of adhesive interface.
Freitas PH; Giannini M; França R; Correr AB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Consani S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 27221518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bond angle effects on microtensile bonds: laboratory and FEA comparison.
Silva NR; Calamia CS; Harsono M; Carvalho RM; Pegoraro LF; Fernandes CA; Vieira AC; Thompson VP
Dent Mater; 2006 Apr; 22(4):314-24. PubMed ID: 16154631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of joint component mechanical properties and adhesive layer thickness on stress distribution in micro-tensile bond strength specimens.
Neves Ade A; Coutinho E; Poitevin A; Van der Sloten J; Van Meerbeek B; Van Oosterwyck H
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 18554711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between degree of conversion, resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives.
Hass V; Dobrovolski M; Zander-Grande C; Martins GC; Gordillo LA; Rodrigues Accorinte Mde L; Gomes OM; Loguercio AD; Reis A
Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):921-8. PubMed ID: 23830512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of resin composite mechanical properties on adhesive microtensile bond strength to dentin.
Goracci C; Margvelashvili M; Apicella D; Sedda M; Magni E; Ferrari M
J Adhes Dent; 2011 Aug; 13(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 20978638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bond durability of adhesives containing modified-monomer with/without-fluoride after aging in artificial saliva and under intrapulpal pressure simulation.
El-Deeb HA; Al Sherbiney HH; Mobarak EH
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 22770483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of luting systems on the microtensile bond strength of dentin to indirect resin-based composite and ceramic restorations.
D'Arcangelo C; De Angelis F; D'Amario M; Zazzeroni S; Ciampoli C; Caputi S
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 19544823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test: a finite element stress analysis.
Placido E; Meira JB; Lima RG; Muench A; de Souza RM; Ballester RY
Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1086-92. PubMed ID: 17123595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microtensile bond strengths for six 2-step and two 1-step self-etch adhesive systems to enamel and dentin.
Reis A; Loguercio AD; Manso AP; Grande RH; Schiltz-Taing M; Suh B; Chen L; Carvalho RM
Am J Dent; 2013 Feb; 26(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 23724549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of sources of uncertainties in microtensile bond strength of dental adhesive system for different specimen geometries.
Ghassemieh E
Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):536-47. PubMed ID: 17697706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin with or without application of an intermediate flowable resin layer.
De Goes MF; Giannini M; Di Hipólito V; Carrilho MR; Daronch M; Rueggeberg FA
Braz Dent J; 2008; 19(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 18438560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of storage times and mechanical load cycling on dentin bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin luting cements.
Aguiar TR; André CB; Correr-Sobrinho L; Arrais CA; Ambrosano GM; Giannini M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):404-10. PubMed ID: 24355507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dentin Bonding Testing Using a Mini-interfacial Fracture Toughness Approach.
Pongprueksa P; De Munck J; Karunratanakul K; Barreto BC; Van Ende A; Senawongse P; Van Meerbeek B
J Dent Res; 2016 Mar; 95(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 26608579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of surface area and geometry of specimens on bond strength in a microtensile test: an analysis by the three-dimensional finite element method.
Ferreira RC; Caldas J; Paula GA; Albuquerque RC; Almeida CM; Vasconcellos WA; Caldas RB
J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):456-63. PubMed ID: 21815966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of desensitizing agents on the microtensile bond strength of a two-step self-etch adhesive to dentin.
Arisu HD; Dalkihç E; Üçtaşli MB
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 21777097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of variations in hourglass specimen design on microtensile bond strength to dentin.
Betamar N; Cardew G; Van Noort R
J Adhes Dent; 2007 Oct; 9(5):427-36. PubMed ID: 18297823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
