These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2228295)

  • 1. New approaches for biocompatibility testing using cell culture.
    Doillon CJ; Cameron K
    Int J Artif Organs; 1990 Aug; 13(8):517-20. PubMed ID: 2228295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel microporous polyurethane blood conduit: biocompatibility assessment of the UTA arterial prosthesis by an organo-typic culture technique.
    Sigot-Luizard MF; Sigot M; Guidoin R; King M; von Maltzahn WW; Kowligi R; Eberhart RC
    J Invest Surg; 1993; 6(3):251-71. PubMed ID: 8398998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biocompatibility of the Vascugraft: evaluation of a novel polyester urethane vascular substitute by an organotypic culture technique.
    Guidoin R; Sigot M; King M; Sigot-Luizard MF
    Biomaterials; 1992; 13(5):281-8. PubMed ID: 1600030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extensive H(+) release by bone substitutes affects biocompatibility in vitro testing.
    Jäger M; Fischer J; Schultheis A; Lensing-Höhn S; Krauspe R
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Feb; 76(2):310-22. PubMed ID: 16270341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo biocompatibility and hemocompatibility of a polytetrafluoroethylene small diameter vascular graft modified with sulfonated silk fibroin.
    Zhang J; Huang H; Ju R; Chen K; Li S; Wang W; Yan Y
    Am J Surg; 2017 Jan; 213(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 27829496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biocompatibility Assessment of a New Biodegradable Vascular Graft via In Vitro Co-culture Approaches and In Vivo Model.
    Enayati M; Eilenberg M; Grasl C; Riedl P; Kaun C; Messner B; Walter I; Liska R; Schima H; Wojta J; Podesser BK; Bergmeister H
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Nov; 44(11):3319-3334. PubMed ID: 27056752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A model system to assess key vascular responses to biomaterials.
    Sprague EA; Palmaz JC
    J Endovasc Ther; 2005 Oct; 12(5):594-604. PubMed ID: 16212461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Current trends in biocompatibility testing.
    Kirkpatrick CJ; Bittinger F; Wagner M; Köhler H; van Kooten TG; Klein CL; Otto M
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1998; 212(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 9611998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Progress in the studies of methods for testing cytotoxicity of dental biomaterial].
    Yuan Y; Zhang W
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jun; 26(3):688-91. PubMed ID: 19634699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro biocompatibility evaluation of naturally derived and synthetic biomaterials using normal human bladder smooth muscle cells.
    Pariente JL; Kim BS; Atala A
    J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1867-71. PubMed ID: 11912450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The place of laboratory medicine in the study of biomaterials biocompatibility].
    Janus A; Rybak Z
    Polim Med; 2013; 43(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 24377188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cell culture methods for testing biocompatibility.
    Pizzoferrato A; Ciapetti G; Stea S; Cenni E; Arciola CR; Granchi D; Savarino L
    Clin Mater; 1994; 15(3):173-90. PubMed ID: 10172075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The coherence between 3 evaluation methods of biocompatibility].
    Camps J; Salomon JP; Pertot WJ; Dejou J
    J Biol Buccale; 1992 Dec; 20(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 1339089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of plasma surface modification techniques to improve hemocompatibility of vascular grafts: A review.
    Solouk A; Cousins BG; Mirzadeh H; Seifalian AM
    Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2011; 58(5):311-27. PubMed ID: 21995534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Growth and fibrinolytic parameters of human umbilical vein endothelial cells seeded onto cardiovascular grafts.
    Zhang JC; Wojta J; Binder BR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Jun; 109(6):1059-65. PubMed ID: 7776669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Acute phase reaction of different macromolecule vascular grafts healing in rat muscle].
    Wang W; Jin B; Ouyang C; Li Y; Xu W; Yang H; Xu H
    Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2010 Jan; 26(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 20353096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of different in vitro tests for biocompatibility screening of Mg alloys.
    Scheideler L; Füger C; Schille C; Rupp F; Wendel HP; Hort N; Reichel HP; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Acta Biomater; 2013 Nov; 9(10):8740-5. PubMed ID: 23429234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How is the biocompatibilty of dental biomaterials evaluated?
    Murray PE; García Godoy C; García Godoy F
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 May; 12(3):E258-66. PubMed ID: 17468726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biocompatibility testing using ATP bioluminescence.
    Crouch SP
    Med Device Technol; 2000 Oct; 11(8):12-5. PubMed ID: 11185180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of textile vascular prosthesis crimping on graft longitudinal elasticity and flexibility.
    Hajjaji R; Abdessalem SB; Ganghoffer JF
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Dec; 16():73-80. PubMed ID: 23159512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.