These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22284088)
21. Pure NOTES sigmoid resection in an animal survival model. Bernhardt J; Köhler P; Rieber F; Diederich M; Schneider-Koriath S; Steffen H; Ludwig K; Lamadé W Endoscopy; 2012 Mar; 44(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 22354825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamics and inspiratory pressures during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): an experimental, controlled study in an acute porcine model. von Delius S; Huber W; Feussner H; Wilhelm D; Karagianni A; Henke J; Preissel A; Schneider A; Schmid RM; Meining A Endoscopy; 2007 Oct; 39(10):854-61. PubMed ID: 17968799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomy closure with an over-the-endoscope clip: a randomized, controlled porcine study (with videos). von Renteln D; Schmidt A; Vassiliou MC; Gieselmann M; Caca K Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Oct; 70(4):732-9. PubMed ID: 19559416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessing transgastric Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery prior to clinical implementation. Donatsky AM Dan Med J; 2014 Aug; 61(8):B4903. PubMed ID: 25162448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surgical Trauma Caused by Different Abdominal Access Routes-Comparison of Open Surgical, Laparoscopic, and NOTES Transgastric Techniques in a Porcine Model. Arroyo Vázquez J; Bergström M; Dot J; Abu-Suboh-Abadia M; Fonseca C; Esteves M; Azadani A; Armengol J; Masachs M; Armengol-Miró JR; Park PO J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Jul; 26(7):511-6. PubMed ID: 27163486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Carbon dioxide versus room air for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and comparison with standard laparoscopic pneumoperitoneum. von Delius S; Sager J; Feussner H; Wilhelm D; Thies P; Huber W; Schuster T; Schneider A; Schmid RM; Meining A Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jul; 72(1):161-9, 169.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20381043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Histological evaluation of pure NOTES - related complications in a survival animal study. Pătraşcu S; Surlin V; Râmboiu S; Georgescu E Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2011; 52(3):867-71. PubMed ID: 21892532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery used for perforated viscus repair is feasible using lower peritoneal pressures than laparoscopy in a porcine model. Moran EA; Gostout CJ; McConico AL; Bingener J J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Apr; 210(4):474-9. PubMed ID: 20347740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Submucosal tunneling using endoscopic submucosal dissection for peritoneal access and closure in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a porcine survival study. Yoshizumi F; Yasuda K; Kawaguchi K; Suzuki K; Shiraishi N; Kitano S Endoscopy; 2009 Aug; 41(8):707-11. PubMed ID: 19670139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for inadvertent colon injury repair: feasibility, risk of abdominal adhesions, and peritoneal contamination in a porcine survival model. Romagnuolo J; Morris J; Palesch S; Hawes R; Lewin D; Morgan K Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Apr; 71(4):817-23. PubMed ID: 20170909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: complications and inflammatory response. Martínek J; Ryska O; Filípková T; Doležel R; Juhas S; Motlík J; Holubová M; Nosek V; Rotnáglová B; Zavoral M; Ryska M World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jul; 18(27):3558-64. PubMed ID: 22826620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of gastrotomy closure modalities for natural orifice transluminal surgery: a canine study. Sun G; Yang Y; Zhang X; Li W; Wang Y; Zhang L; Tang P; Kong J; Zhang R; Meng J; Wang X Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 May; 77(5):774-83. PubMed ID: 23453129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Safety and efficacy of the submucosal tunnel without mucosal closure for the transgastric approach in a porcine survival model. Akagi T; Yasuda K; Kono Y; Suzuki K; Kawaguchi K; Yoshizumi F; Inomata M; Shiraishi N; Kitano S Surg Innov; 2012 Dec; 19(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 22333937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): an emerging technique in surgery. Shrestha BM JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2011; 51(184):209-12. PubMed ID: 22922904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Endoscopic colotomy closure for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery using a T-fastener prototype in comparison to conventional laparoscopic suture closure. Sporn E; Bachman SL; Miedema BW; Loy TS; Calaluce R; Thaler K Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Oct; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 18534584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Feasibility of fibrin glue versus endoclips to close the transgastric peritoneal access site in NOTES in a survival porcine study. Yoshizumi F; Yasuda K; Suzuki K; Kawaguchi K; Inomata M; Shiraishi N; Kitano S Asian J Endosc Surg; 2011 May; 4(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 22776225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A randomized comparison of a new flexible bipolar hemostasis forceps designed principally for NOTES versus a conventional surgical laparoscopic bipolar forceps for intra-abdominal vessel sealing in a porcine model. Park PO; Long GL; Bergström M; Cunningham C; Vakharia OJ; Bakos GJ; Bally KR; Rothstein RI; Swain CP Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Apr; 71(4):835-41. PubMed ID: 19942215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]