These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22284152)

  • 1. Decision to incision: time to reconsider.
    Boehm FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 206(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 22284152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision-to-incision time: how to accomplish this calculation.
    Levine EM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 207(3):e10; author reply e10. PubMed ID: 22698662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Achievement of the 30-minute standard in obstetrics-can it be done?
    Nageotte MP; Vander Wal B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 206(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 22000896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antenatal corticosteroids: too much of anything is bad?
    Naik SS; Das RR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 207(3):e10-1; author reply e11-e12. PubMed ID: 22626569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ACOG criteria set. Cesarean delivery. Number 35, July 1998. Committee on Quality Assessment. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Nov; 63(2):206-7. PubMed ID: 9856333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inconsistencies in clinical decisions in obstetrics.
    Lancet; 1990 Dec; 336(8727):1376-7. PubMed ID: 1978179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean section.
    Clin Privil White Pap; 2017 Jul; (76):1-19. PubMed ID: 29457881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External cephalic version.
    Committee on Practice Guidelines--Gynecology, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 Feb; 72(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 11291628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are integrated care pathways suitable for maternity care?
    Robotham M; Cro S
    Nurs Times; 2001 Aug 23-29; 97(34):20. PubMed ID: 11957646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A plea for professional independence.
    Dietz HP; Stokes BJ
    Med J Aust; 2012 Feb; 196():104-5. PubMed ID: 22304593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cesarean section.
    Clin Privil White Pap; 2008 Dec; (76):1-16. PubMed ID: 19123292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Changing trends and indications for cesarean section in the last few decades].
    Nagy S
    Orv Hetil; 2014 Jul; 155(29):1140-6. PubMed ID: 25016445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quality assurance in obstetric practice].
    Lund E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Apr; 113(10):1205. PubMed ID: 8493646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. L.A. County learns costly lesson on mandated labor guidelines.
    Jackson R
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1998 Apr; 10(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 10184893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A discussion of medical malpractice and cesarean section.
    Berkman H
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1993 Apr; (170):9-30. PubMed ID: 10125422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of barriers and facilitators for optimal cesarean section care: perspective of professionals.
    Melman S; Schreurs RHP; Dirksen CD; Kwee A; Nijhuis JG; Smeets NAC; Scheepers HCJ; Hermens RPMG
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jul; 17(1):230. PubMed ID: 28709410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The four-category classification of the urgency of caesarean sections in the UK needs vital improvements.
    Sholapurkar SL
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Mar; 222():185-186. PubMed ID: 29366601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Chittiphavorn S; Pinjaroen S; Suwanrath C; Soonthornpun K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Jun; 89(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 16850670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Case for Standardizing Cesarean Delivery Technique: Seeing the Forest for the Trees.
    Dahlke JD; Mendez-Figueroa H; Maggio L; Sperling JD; Chauhan SP; Rouse DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 136(5):972-980. PubMed ID: 33030865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Is it necessary for obstetricians to have their own opinion concerning cesarean delivery in patients with non-obstetric diseases].
    Katsulov A; Iankov M; Koleva Zh
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44 Suppl 1():12-5. PubMed ID: 16032905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.