BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22284228)

  • 41. ISSLS prize winner: cost-effectiveness of two forms of circumferential lumbar fusion: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Freeman BJ; Steele NA; Sach TH; Hegarty J; Soegaard R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2891-7. PubMed ID: 18246014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. SF-6D values stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
    Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Canan CE; Burke LO; Glassman SD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E804-8. PubMed ID: 22228327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical sequelae after rhBMP-2 use in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Cha TD; Khan SN; Fineberg SJ; Pelton MA
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1118-25. PubMed ID: 24029138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. How do coverage policies influence practice patterns, safety, and cost of initial lumbar fusion surgery? A population-based comparison of workers' compensation systems.
    Martin BI; Franklin GM; Deyo RA; Wickizer TM; Lurie JD; Mirza SK
    Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1237-46. PubMed ID: 24210578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cost utility analysis of caudal epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, axial or discogenic low back pain, central spinal stenosis, and post lumbar surgery syndrome.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Pampati V; Cash KA; Benyamin RM; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2013; 16(3):E129-43. PubMed ID: 23703415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Primary and Revision Posterior Lumbar Fusion Have Similar Short-Term Complication Rates.
    Basques BA; Diaz-Collado PJ; Geddes BJ; Samuel AM; Lukasiewicz AM; Webb ML; Bohl DD; Ahn J; Singh K; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E101-6. PubMed ID: 26539938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion complicated by deep wound infection: a case-control study.
    Petilon JM; Glassman SD; Dimar JR; Carreon LY
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):1370-4. PubMed ID: 22261633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cost analysis of incidental durotomy in spine surgery.
    Nandyala SV; Elboghdady IM; Marquez-Lara A; Noureldin MN; Sankaranarayanan S; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug; 39(17):E1042-51. PubMed ID: 24859577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Disparities in the outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery based on insurance status.
    Lad SP; Huang KT; Bagley JH; Hazzard MA; Babu R; Owens TR; Ugiliweneza B; Patil CG; Boakye M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):1119-27. PubMed ID: 23354106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cost Implications of Primary Versus Revision Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity.
    Qureshi R; Puvanesarajah V; Jain A; Kebaish K; Shimer A; Shen F; Hassanzadeh H
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Aug; 104():68-73. PubMed ID: 28502681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Predictors of extended length of stay, discharge to inpatient rehab, and hospital readmission following elective lumbar spine surgery: introduction of the Carolina-Semmes Grading Scale.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Chotai S; Pfortmiller D; Sorenson JM; Foley K; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):382-390. PubMed ID: 28498068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Long-term follow-up of revision decompressive lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients.
    Shabat S; Arinzon Z; Gepstein R; Folman Y
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 May; 24(3):142-5. PubMed ID: 21519302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Decompression With or Without Fusion for Lumbar Stenosis: A Cost Minimization Analysis.
    Ziino C; Mertz K; Hu S; Kamal R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Mar; 45(5):325-332. PubMed ID: 32045402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Epidemiological trends in the utilization of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal fusions from 2002 to 2011.
    Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):491-6. PubMed ID: 24365905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Surgery for spinal stenosis: long-term reoperation rates, health care cost, and impact of instrumentation.
    Lad SP; Babu R; Ugiliweneza B; Patil CG; Boakye M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):978-87. PubMed ID: 24718058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Patient Body Mass Index is an Independent Predictor of 30-Day Hospital Readmission After Elective Spine Surgery.
    Elsamadicy AA; Adogwa O; Vuong VD; Mehta AI; Vasquez RA; Cheng J; Karikari IO; Bagley CA
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Dec; 96():148-151. PubMed ID: 27593714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Patient-specific factors affecting hospital costs in lumbar spine surgery.
    Puffer RC; Planchard R; Mallory GW; Clarke MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26360143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome scores in lumbar fusion surgery.
    Lambat MP; Glassman SD; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Mar; 18(3):265-8. PubMed ID: 23289509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.