These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22284283)

  • 1. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics.
    Hockley A; Weinstein M; Borislow AJ; Braitman LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 22284283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.
    Pithon MM; Silva IS; Almeida IO; Nery MS; de Souza ML; Barbosa G; Dos Santos AF; da Silva Coqueiro R
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23957665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles.
    Nomura M; Motegi E; Hatch JP; Gakunga PT; Ng'ang'a PM; Rugh JD; Yamaguchi H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S87-95. PubMed ID: 19362272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ricketts' E-line profile preferences among Nigerian orthodontists, orthodontic trainees, and a young undergraduate students' population.
    Otuyemi O; Afolabi D; Oyewole T
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Apr; 25(4):541-547. PubMed ID: 35439916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Esthetic evaluation of the facial profile in rehabilitated adults with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate.
    Ferrari Júnior FM; Ayub PV; Capelozza Filho L; Pereira Lauris JR; Garib DG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 73(1):169.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25511967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of vermilion height on lip esthetics in Japanese and Korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients.
    Ioi H; Kang S; Shimomura T; Kim SS; Park SB; Son WS; Takahashi I
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 24021016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability of analytical reference lines for determining esthetically pleasing lip position: An assessment of consistency, sensitivity, and specificity.
    Ng JHH; Singh P; Wang Z; Yang Y; Khambay BS; Gu M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jul; 164(1):e14-e26. PubMed ID: 37227323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, oral surgeons, and laypersons for Persian facial profiles.
    Imani MM; Sanei E; Niaki EA; Shahroudi AS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Sep; 154(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 30173845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of White and Chinese perception of esthetic Chinese lip position.
    Chong HT; Thea KW; Descallar J; Chen Y; Dalci O; Wong R; Darendeliler MA
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 23914821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of vertical positions of anterior teeth on smile esthetics in Japanese and korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients.
    Ioi H; Kang S; Shimomura T; Kim SS; Park SB; Son WS; Takahashi I
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Aug; 25(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 23910186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment.
    Huang YP; Li WR
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial profile preferences of black women before and after orthodontic treatment.
    McKoy-White J; Evans CA; Viana G; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 16443473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of anteroposterior lip positions in the most-favored Iranian facial profiles using silhouette.
    Sodagar A; Borujeni DG
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Sep; 10(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 24910646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Esthetic preferences for facial soft tissue profiles.
    Sukhia RH; Khan M; Fida M; Shaikh A; Azam SI
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):17-23. PubMed ID: 22031990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The "Central Tendency Bias" in the assessment of facial attractiveness in group-based and individual ratings-A survey-based study in 727 volunteers.
    Alfertshofer M; Kempa J; Biesman BS; Knoedler S; Knoedler L; Bravo C; Davidovic K; Antoszewski B; Timler W; Kasielska-Trojan A; Cotofana S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 May; 92():264-275. PubMed ID: 38582052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.
    Fortes HN; Guimarães TC; Belo IM; da Matta EN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 24945516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft tissue evaluation of contemporary Caucasian and African American female facial profiles.
    Sutter RE; Turley PK
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):487-96. PubMed ID: 9851345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of sagittal and oblique smiling profiles in evaluating facial esthetics.
    Yang X; Yi Y; Yang S; Xue C; Wang Y; Chen M; Han X; Bai D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):532-6. PubMed ID: 25668109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of laterality on esthetic preferences of orthodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, and laypeople regarding the lip position and facial convexity: a psychometric clinical trial.
    Mousavi SM; Saeidi Ghorani P; Deilamani A; Rakhshan V
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 23(4):439-451. PubMed ID: 31446526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.