103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22284530)
1. Urgency of referral and its impact on outcome in patients with colorectal cancer.
Ramsay G; MacKay C; Nanthakumaran S; Craig WL; McAdam TK; Loudon MA
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Jul; 14(7):e375-7. PubMed ID: 22284530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the bowel-screening programme on the diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Ayrshire and Arran.
Roxburgh CS; McTaggart F; Balsitis M; Diament RH
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jan; 15(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 22632378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of the '2-week wait' referral service for colorectal cancer.
Leung E; Grainger J; Bandla N; Wong L
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Nov; 64(12):1671-4. PubMed ID: 20946272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How has the 'two-week wait' rule affected the presentation of colorectal cancer?
Chohan DP; Goodwin K; Wilkinson S; Miller R; Hall NR
Colorectal Dis; 2005 Sep; 7(5):450-3. PubMed ID: 16108880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A study on the routes of referral for patients with colorectal cancer and its affect on the time to surgery and pathological stage.
Trickett JP; Donaldson DR; Bearn PE; Scott HJ; Hassall AC
Colorectal Dis; 2004 Nov; 6(6):428-31. PubMed ID: 15521930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of surgeon and pathologist on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its impact on survival for patients with Dukes' stage B disease.
Evans MD; Barton K; Rees A; Stamatakis JD; Karandikar SS
Colorectal Dis; 2008 Feb; 10(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 17477849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 10-year study of outcome following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases - The effect of evaluation in a multidisciplinary team setting.
Lordan JT; Karanjia ND; Quiney N; Fawcett WJ; Worthington TR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Mar; 35(3):302-6. PubMed ID: 18328668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.
Iversen LH
Dan Med J; 2012 Apr; 59(4):B4428. PubMed ID: 22459726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A paradox explained? Patients with delayed diagnosis of symptomatic colorectal cancer have good prognosis.
Rupassara KS; Ponnusamy S; Withanage N; Milewski PJ
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Jun; 8(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 16684087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Targets and elective colorectal cancer: outcome and symptom delay at surgical resection.
Bharucha S; Hughes S; Kenyon V; Anderson ID; Carlson GL; Scott NA
Colorectal Dis; 2005 Mar; 7(2):169-71. PubMed ID: 15720357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of the Scottish Bowel Cancer Screening Programme on patient and tumour characteristics at a single centre.
Mackay C; Ramsay G; Rafferty A; Loudon M
J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Feb; 20(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 23890078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of a patient consultation questionnaire and weighted numerical scoring system for the prediction of colorectal cancer and other colorectal pathology in symptomatic patients: a prospective cohort validation study of a Welsh population.
Ballal MS; Selvachandran SN; Maw A
Colorectal Dis; 2010 May; 12(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 19570067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stage, survival and delays in lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer: comparison between diagnostic routes.
Neal RD; Allgar VL; Ali N; Leese B; Heywood P; Proctor G; Evans J
Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Mar; 57(536):212-9. PubMed ID: 17359608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical presentation and waiting time targets do not affect prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Raptis DA; Fessas C; Belasyse-Smith P; Kurzawinski TR
Surgeon; 2010 Oct; 8(5):239-46. PubMed ID: 20709279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing oncological outcomes in patients who develop pulmonary metastases after curative resection of colorectal cancer.
Kim CH; Huh JW; Kim HJ; Lim SW; Song SY; Kim HR; Na KJ; Kim YJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Apr; 55(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 22426271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advanced tumor stage is an independent risk factor of postoperative infectious complications after colorectal surgery: arguments from a case-matched series.
Bot J; Piessen G; Robb WB; Roger V; Mariette C
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 May; 56(5):568-76. PubMed ID: 23575395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeat 2-week wait referrals for colorectal cancer.
Vaughan-Shaw PG; Cutting JE; Borley NR; Wheeler JM
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Mar; 15(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 22776207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The association between referral source and stage of disease in patients with colorectal cancer.
Bevis PM; Donaldson OW; Card M; Durdey P; Thomas MG; Sylvester PA; Longman RJ
Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jan; 10(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 17477850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A single common urgent pathway for all colorectal referrals reduces time to diagnosis and treatment.
Scott MA; Knight A; Brown K; Novell JR
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):766-71. PubMed ID: 17032322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The process and outcomes of a nurse-led colorectal cancer follow-up clinic.
McFarlane K; Dixon L; Wakeman CJ; Robertson GM; Eglinton TW; Frizelle FA
Colorectal Dis; 2012 May; 14(5):e245-9. PubMed ID: 22182050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
