These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2228550)
21. Is there a constitutional right to die? Wickett A Euthan Rev; 1986; 1(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 11649799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Beyond misguided paternalism: resuscitating the right to refuse medical treatment. Malloy SE Wake Forest Law Rev; 1998; 33():1035-91. PubMed ID: 11660805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Summary of California law regarding life support issues. Hartz JN HEC Forum; 1990; 2(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 10105609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly. Baron CH J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Living wills in New York: are they valid? Vile SE Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities: 1986 developments. National Legal Center Staff. Issues Law Med; 1987 Jan; 2(4):255-76. PubMed ID: 2951349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Accepting the consequences of a treatment-refusal decision. Moore DL Bioeth Bull; 1995; 4(2):13-7. PubMed ID: 11822418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health. Barton RS Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 1903782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The case of Brother Fox: immunity procedures in the treatment of terminally ill incompetent patients. Williams CD Medicoleg News; 1980 Sep; 8(4):11-3. PubMed ID: 10248379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Cruzan and the demands of due process. Haddad ME Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(2):205-28. PubMed ID: 1399496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. In re Guardianship of Browning. Bourke LH Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 2126263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Unilateral withholding and withdrawal of potentially life-sustaining treatment: a violation of dignity under the law in Canada. Downie J J Palliat Care; 2004; 20(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 15511032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The duty to care--the right to refuse. Changing roles of patients and physicians in end-of-life decision making. Garwin M J Leg Med; 1998 Mar; 19(1):99-125. PubMed ID: 9564096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In re Fiori. Devlin MM Issues Law Med; 1996; 12(2):189-90. PubMed ID: 8936851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of life-prolonging technologies on end-of-life care in India. Pandya SK Indian J Med Ethics; 2005; 2(3):76-7. PubMed ID: 16276638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. "Culture of life" politics at the bedside--the case of Terri Schiavo. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2005 Apr; 352(16):1710-5. PubMed ID: 15784657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Avoiding resuscitation in non-hospital settings: no consent forms. Reynolds DF; Garrett CK Bioethics Forum; 1998; 14(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 11656885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Saying no to life: reflections on death and justice. In re Lawrance. Avila D Issues Law Med; 1993; 9(3):227-54. PubMed ID: 8106235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. On discontinuing dialysis. Wight J J Med Ethics; 1993 Jun; 19(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 8331641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]