344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2228588)
21. The case of Ms. Nancy Cruzan and the care of the elderly.
Glover JJ
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1990 May; 38(5):588-93. PubMed ID: 2110203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan.
Weir RF; Gostin L
JAMA; 1990 Oct; 264(14):1846-53. PubMed ID: 2402044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The ethics of Cruzan. Families, not states, should make treatment termination decisions.
Brodeur D
Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):42-7. PubMed ID: 10107438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The long dying of Nancy Cruzan.
Annas GJ
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):52-9. PubMed ID: 1910131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Cruzan and the demands of due process.
Haddad ME
Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(2):205-28. PubMed ID: 1399496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Securing patients' right to refuse medical care: in praise of the Cruzan decision.
Emanuel EJ
Am J Med; 1992 Mar; 92(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 1546730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. Lessons from Nancy Cruzan.
Fairman RP
Arch Intern Med; 1992 Jan; 152(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 1728924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Cruzan: facing the inevitable.
Bopp J; Marzen TJ
Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(1-2):37-51. PubMed ID: 1910130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law.
Bopp J; Avila D
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health.
Barton RS
Issues Law Med; 1991; 6(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 1903782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Too much ado.
Albert LA
J Leg Med; 1991 Sep; 12(3):331-58. PubMed ID: 1748837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. In the Supreme Court of the United States. No. 88-1503. Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Lester L. Cruzan, et ux., petitioners, v. Director, Missouri Department Health, et al.
Issues Law Med; 1990; 5(4):453-78. PubMed ID: 2108100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Foreword: can Glucksberg survive Lawrence? Another look at the end of life and personal autonomy.
Kamisar Y
Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1453-78. PubMed ID: 18595210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bioethicists' statement on the U.S. Supreme Court's Cruzan decision.
Annas GJ; Arnold B; Aroskar M; Battin P; Bartels D; Beauchamp T; Brock D; Buchanan A; Caplan A; Cohen C
N Engl J Med; 1990 Sep; 323(10):686-7. PubMed ID: 2385279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Lessons from Cruzan.
Meisel A
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 2132020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Tube feeding and the permanently unconscious: the Supreme Court's decision in Cruzan.
Rouse F
Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 10183493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of families as surrogate decisionmakers after Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.
Rushton CH; Hogue EE
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991; 7():219-38. PubMed ID: 10111247
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty.
Bopp J; Avila D
Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan.
Karbal W
J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Cruzan decision and medical practice.
Thomasma DC
Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):853-4. PubMed ID: 2025130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
