266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22285907)
1. Involved anterior margins after breast conserving surgery: is re-excision required?
Mullen R; Macaskill EJ; Khalil A; Elseedawy E; Brown DC; Lee AC; Purdie CA; Jordan LB; Thompson AM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 22285907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictors of surgical margin status in breast-conserving surgery within a breast screening program.
Kurniawan ED; Wong MH; Windle I; Rose A; Mou A; Buchanan M; Collins JP; Miller JA; Gruen RL; Mann GB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):2542-9. PubMed ID: 18618180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review of re-excision for narrow or positive margins of invasive and intraductal carcinoma.
Gupta A; Subhas G; Dubay L; Silapaswan S; Kolachalam R; Kestenberg W; Ferguson L; Jacobs MJ; Gorieil Y; Mittal VK
Am Surg; 2010 Jul; 76(7):731-4. PubMed ID: 20698380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal use of re-excision in patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer by excisional biopsy treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Caughran JL; Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Dekhne NS; Benitez PR; Goldstein NS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):3020-7. PubMed ID: 19636632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.
Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiple re-excisions versus mastectomy in patients with persistent residual disease following breast conservation surgery.
Cellini C; Huston TL; Martins D; Christos P; Carson J; Kemper S; Simmons RM
Am J Surg; 2005 Jun; 189(6):662-6. PubMed ID: 15910716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A two-millimetre free margin from invasive tumour minimises residual disease in breast-conserving surgery.
Ward ST; Jones BG; Jewkes AJ
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Nov; 64(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 20946273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?
Jacobson AF; Asad J; Boolbol SK; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Feldman SM
Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 18809063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does intraductal breast cancer spread in a segmental distribution? An analysis of residual tumour burden following segmental mastectomy using tumour bed biopsies.
Jenkinson AD; Al-Mufti RA; Mohsen Y; Berry MJ; Wells C; Carpenter R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2001 Feb; 27(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11237487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Close/positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: additional resection or no resection?
Wood WC
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S115-7. PubMed ID: 24074771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Margin width is not predictive of residual disease on re-excision in breast conserving therapy.
Hadzikadic Gusic L; McGuire KP; Ozmen T; Soran A; Thomas CR; McAuliffe PF; Diego EJ; Bonaventura M; Johnson RR; Ahrendt GM
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 109(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 24338603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins.
Cellini C; Hollenbeck ST; Christos P; Martins D; Carson J; Kemper S; Lavigne E; Chan E; Simmons R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):915-20. PubMed ID: 15383425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the volume of ductal carcinoma in situ impact the positive margin rate in patients undergoing breast conservation for invasive breast cancer?
Martin-Dunlap TM; Cyr AE; Al Mushawah F; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 23688789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Margin width should not still enforce a systematic surgical re-excision in the conservative treatment of early breast infiltrative ductal carcinoma.
Jaffré I; Campion L; Dejode M; Bordes V; Sagan C; Loussouarn D; Dravet F; Andrieux N; Classe JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Nov; 20(12):3831-8. PubMed ID: 23838905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Margin status in invasive breast cancer].
Houvenaeghel G; Lambaudie E; Buttarelli M; Cohen M; Bannier M; Tallet A; Jacquemier J
Bull Cancer; 2008 Dec; 95(12):1161-70. PubMed ID: 19091649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload.
Rizzo M; Iyengar R; Gabram SG; Park J; Birdsong G; Chandler KL; Mosunjac MB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):228-34. PubMed ID: 19636625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
