BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22286625)

  • 1. Evaluation of the value of p53 protein expression in the extra-capsular extension of prostate cancer.
    Saidi S; Georgiev V; Stavridis S; Penev M; Stankov O; Dohcev S; Banev S; Danilovski D; Ivanovski O; Popov Z
    Prilozi; 2011; 32(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 22286625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of extraprostatic extension by prostate specific antigen velocity, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Nishimoto K; Nakashima J; Hashiguchi A; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Nakagawa K; Ohigashi T; Oya M; Murai M
    Int J Urol; 2008 Jun; 15(6):520-3. PubMed ID: 18422574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.
    Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic significance of p53 nuclear accumulation in localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.
    Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Head DR; Golovsky D; Wilson JD; Brenner PC; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Finlayson JF; Stricker PD; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL
    Cancer Res; 2000 Mar; 60(6):1585-94. PubMed ID: 10749127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting pathological outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a preoperative nomogram.
    Abdollah F; Klett DE; Sood A; Sammon JD; Pucheril D; Dalela D; Diaz M; Peabody JO; Trinh QD; Menon M
    BJU Int; 2015 Nov; 116(5):703-12. PubMed ID: 25413443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A solitary positive prostate cancer biopsy does not predict a unilateral lesion in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Koie T; Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Yoneyama T; Kawamura S; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Arai Y; Ohyama C
    Scand J Urol; 2015 Apr; 49(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 25165894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the tertiary Gleason pattern influence the PSA progression-free interval after retropubic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer?
    van Oort IM; Schout BM; Kiemeney LA; Hulsbergen CA; Witjes JA
    Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 16046051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease.
    Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Hara I; Eto H
    Int J Urol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 15828954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Subclassification of clinical stage T1 prostate cancer: impact on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
    Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Carter HB; Peck HJ; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1277-80; discussion 1280-1. PubMed ID: 17698121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Serum prostate-specific antigen and the biologic progression of prostate cancer.
    Kabalin JN; McNeal JE; Johnstone IM; Stamey TA
    Urology; 1995 Jul; 46(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 7541589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Percentage of cancer in prostate biopsies as prognostic factor for staging and postoperative biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
    Villamón-Fort R; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM; Soriano-Sarriá P; Ramos-Soler D; Pastor-Hernández F; Gil-Salom M
    Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 17495491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
    Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
    Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of micrometastatic prostate cancer cells in the lymph nodes by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction is predictive of biochemical recurrence in pathological stage T2 prostate cancer.
    Okegawa T; Nutahara K; Higashihara E
    J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1183-8. PubMed ID: 10737491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting pelvic lymph node involvement in current-era prostate cancer.
    Rahman S; Cosmatos H; Dave G; Williams S; Tome M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):906-10. PubMed ID: 21300478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual estimation of tumour extent is not an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence.
    Jones TD; Koch MO; Lin H; Cheng L
    BJU Int; 2005 Dec; 96(9):1253-7. PubMed ID: 16287440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.