These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22287219)

  • 1. More evidence for a dual-process model of conditional reasoning.
    Markovits H; Forgues HL; Brunet ML
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):736-47. PubMed ID: 22287219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Logical reasoning versus information processing in the dual-strategy model of reasoning.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jan; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 27176044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Additional evidence for a dual-strategy model of reasoning: Probabilistic reasoning is more invariant than reasoning about logical validity.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1208-15. PubMed ID: 26148720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interactions between inferential strategies and belief bias.
    Markovits H; Brisson J; de Chantal PL; Thompson VA
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Oct; 45(7):1182-1192. PubMed ID: 28608194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is inferential reasoning just probabilistic reasoning in disguise?
    Markovits H; Handley S
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16532862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reasoning strategies and semantic memory effects in deductive reasoning.
    Brisson J; Markovits H
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Aug; 48(6):920-930. PubMed ID: 32107718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reasoning with conditionals: a test of formal models of four theories.
    Oberauer K
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Nov; 53(3):238-83. PubMed ID: 16729993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct evidence for a dual process model of deductive inference.
    Markovits H; Brunet ML; Thompson V; Brisson J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1213-22. PubMed ID: 23206167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reasoning with conditionals: does every counterexample count? It's frequency that counts.
    Geiger SM; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2060-74. PubMed ID: 18265621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different developmental patterns of simple deductive and probabilistic inferential reasoning.
    Markovits H; Thompson V
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Sep; 36(6):1066-78. PubMed ID: 18927025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Who resists belief-biased inferences? The role of individual differences in reasoning strategies, working memory, and attentional focus.
    de Chantal PL; Newman IR; Thompson V; Markovits H
    Mem Cognit; 2020 May; 48(4):655-671. PubMed ID: 31792857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Counterexamples in sentential reasoning.
    Johnson-Laird PN; Hasson U
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1105-13. PubMed ID: 14704025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An inverse belief-bias effect: more evidence for the role of inhibitory processes in logical reasoning.
    Markovits H; Saelen C; Forgues HL
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 19261586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reasoning strategies predict use of very fast logical reasoning.
    Markovits H; de Chantal PL; Brisson J; Dubé É; Thompson V; Newman I
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):532-543. PubMed ID: 33057905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of retrieval correlates with "logical" reasoning from causal conditional premises.
    Markovits H; Quinn S
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):696-706. PubMed ID: 12219887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Syllogistic reasoning time: disconfirmation disconfirmed.
    Thompson VA; Striemer CL; Reikoff R; Gunter RW; Campbell JI
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):184-9. PubMed ID: 12747506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.
    Weidenfeld A; Oberauer K; Hörnig R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Nov; 58(8):1479-513. PubMed ID: 16365951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A curious belief-bias effect: reasoning with false premises and inhibition of real-life information.
    Markovits H; Schroyens W
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17341013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The difference between generating counter examples and using them during reasoning.
    Verschueren N; Schaeken W; De Neys W; d'Ydewalle G
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1285-308. PubMed ID: 15513247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reasoning strategies explain individual differences in social reasoning.
    Gagnon-St-Pierre É; Doucerain MM; Markovits H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Feb; 150(2):340-353. PubMed ID: 32897098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.