These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22287373)

  • 1. Improved function of prototype 4.3-mm Medtronic Quadcut microdebrider blade over standard 4.0-mm Medtronic Tricut microdebrider blade.
    Boone JL; Feldt BA; McMains KC; Weitzel EK
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2011; 1(3):198-200. PubMed ID: 22287373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microdebriders used in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: secondary analysis and validation of a new tissue model.
    Dave SP; Polak M; Casiano RR
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Sep; 115(9):1641-5. PubMed ID: 16148710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Destructive complication due to the use of a microdebrider: a case report.
    Civelek S; Sayin I; Yilmaz A; Turgut S
    B-ENT; 2011; 7(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 22338243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Sinonasal Polyposis: Microdebrider or Conventional Instruments.
    Lageju N; Pradhan B; Thapa N
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2017; 56(208):447-50. PubMed ID: 29453478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Innovations in microdebrider technology and design.
    Bruggers S; Sindwani R
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2009 Oct; 42(5):781-7, viii. PubMed ID: 19909858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cadaveric comparison of canine fossa vs transnasal maxillary sinus access.
    Feldt BA; McMains KC; Weitzel EK
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2011; 1(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 22287370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the microdebrider and standard instruments in endoscopic sinus surgery: a double-blind randomised study.
    Sauer M; Lemmens W; Vauterin T; Jorissen M
    B-ENT; 2007; 3(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17451119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advances in Microdebrider Technology: Improving Functionality and Expanding Utility.
    Tang D; Lobo BC; D'Anza B; Woodard TD; Sindwani R
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2017 Jun; 50(3):589-598. PubMed ID: 28372812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Microdebrider polypectomy and local corticosteroids].
    Deloire C; Brugel-Ribère L; Peynègre R; Rugina M; Coste A; Papon JF
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2007 Nov; 124(5):232-8. PubMed ID: 17678869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bipolar microdebrider may reduce intraoperative blood loss and operating time during nasal polyp surgery.
    Kumar N; Sindwani R
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2012 Aug; 91(8):336-44. PubMed ID: 22930083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical treatment of nasal polyposis: a comparison between cutting forceps and microdebrider.
    Tirelli G; Gatto A; Spinato G; Tofanelli M
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2013; 27(6):e202-6. PubMed ID: 24274215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ventricular tachycardia as an electrocardiography artifact during functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Gaiser RR; Demetry DJ; Schlosser R
    Am J Rhinol; 2003; 17(2):83-5. PubMed ID: 12751701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Rotation suction-knife (shaver) in otorhinolaryngological surgery].
    Dalke K; Burduk P; Mierzwiński J; Kaźmierczak H
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2006; 60(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 16821539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The microdebrider, a step forward or an expensive gadget?
    Cornet ME; Reinartz SM; Georgalas C; van Spronsen E; Fokkens WJ
    Rhinology; 2012 Jun; 50(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 22616081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endoscopic Caldwell-Luc technique.
    Masterson L; Al Gargaz W; Bath AP
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Jun; 124(6):663-5. PubMed ID: 20053312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The efficacy and safety of an office-based polypectomy with a vacuum-powered microdebrider.
    Gan EC; Habib AR; Hathorn I; Javer AR
    Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2013 Nov; 3(11):890-5. PubMed ID: 23868833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic sinus surgery for antrochoanal polyp using CO2 laser and/or microresector: a long-term result.
    Sato K; Nakashima T
    J Laryngol Otol; 2005 May; 119(5):362-5. PubMed ID: 15949099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Malfunctioning microdebrider: should it always be replaced?
    Yanagisawa E; Joe JK
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 Oct; 76(10):704. PubMed ID: 9345812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of retraction pressure between novel and conventional retractor systems--a cadaver study.
    Pattavilakom A; Seex KA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 May; 12(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 20433304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expanding applications for the microdebrider in pediatric endoscopic airway surgery.
    Rees CJ; Tridico TI; Kirse DJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2005 Oct; 133(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 16213920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.