139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22287690)
1. Accuracy of the revised 2010 TNM classification in predicting the prognosis of patients treated for renal cell cancer in the north east of England.
Veeratterapillay R; Simren R; El-Sherif A; Johnson MI; Soomro N; Heer R
J Clin Pathol; 2012 Apr; 65(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 22287690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic significance of tumour size in patients after tumour nephrectomy for localised renal cell carcinoma.
Steiner T; Knels R; Schubert J
Eur Urol; 2004 Sep; 46(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 15306102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma.
Javidan J; Stricker HJ; Tamboli P; Amin MB; Peabody JO; Deshpande A; Menon M; Amin MB
J Urol; 1999 Oct; 162(4):1277-81. PubMed ID: 10492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of TNM, 2002 version, in localized renal cell carcinoma: is it able to predict different cancer-specific survival probability?
Ficarra V; Novara G; Galfano A; Novella G; Schiavone D; Artibani W
Urology; 2004 Jun; 63(6):1050-4. PubMed ID: 15183948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reevaluation of TNM staging of renal cortical tumors: recurrence and survival for T1N0M0 and T3aN0M0 tumors are equivalent.
Gilbert SM; Murphy AM; Katz AE; Goluboff ET; Sawczuk IS; Olsson CA; Benson MC; McKiernan JM
Urology; 2006 Aug; 68(2):287-91. PubMed ID: 16904438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reassessment of the 1997 TNM classification system for renal cell carcinoma.
Elmore JM; Kadesky KT; Koeneman KS; Sagalowsky AI
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2329-34. PubMed ID: 14635066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative prognostic nomogram (probability table) for renal cell carcinoma based on TNM classification.
Kanao K; Mizuno R; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Nakagawa K; Ohigashi T; Nakashima J; Oya M
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):480-5; discussion 485. PubMed ID: 19100568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognosticfactors in patients with renal cell carcinoma: is TNM (1997) staging relevant in Indian subpopulation?
Srivastava A; Mandhani A; Kapoor R; Jain M; Dubey D; Srivastava A; Raghavendra M; Kumar A
Indian J Cancer; 2004; 41(3):99-103. PubMed ID: 15472406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic relevance of tumour size in T3a renal cell carcinoma: a multicentre experience.
Lam JS; Klatte T; Patard JJ; Goel RH; Guillè F; Lobel B; Abbou CC; De La Taille A; Tostain J; Cindolo L; Altieri V; Ficarra V; Artibani W; Prayer-Galetti T; Schips L; Zigeuner R; Pantuck AJ; Figlin RA; Belldegrun AS
Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 17316970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma evaluated: revising stage T3a.
Siemer S; Lehmann J; Loch A; Becker F; Stein U; Schneider G; Ziegler M; Stöckle M
J Urol; 2005 Jan; 173(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15592020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposal of an improved prognostic classification for pT3 renal cell carcinoma.
Terrone C; Gontero P; Volpe A; Porpiglia F; Bollito E; Zattoni F; Frea B; Tizzani A; Fontana D; Scarpa RM; Rossetti SR
J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 18485380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perinephric and renal sinus fat infiltration in pT3a renal cell carcinoma: possible prognostic differences.
Bedke J; Buse S; Pritsch M; Macher-Goeppinger S; Schirmacher P; Haferkamp A; Hohenfellner M
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(10):1349-54. PubMed ID: 19076147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathological follow-up study after radical nephrectomy.
Zubac DP; Bostad L; Gestblom C; Kihl B; Seidal T; Wentzel-Larsen T; Bakke AM
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2007; 41(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 17469026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Limited prognostic value of tumor necrosis in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Isbarn H; Patard JJ; Lughezzani G; Rioux-Leclercq N; Crépel M; Cindolo L; de la Taille A; Zini L; Villers A; Shariat SF; Bertini R; Karakiewicz PI
Urology; 2010 Jun; 75(6):1378-84. PubMed ID: 19781745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Volume-weighted mean nuclear volume as a prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma.
Soda T; Fujikawa K; Ito T; Sasaki M; Nishio Y; Miyakawa M
Lab Invest; 1999 Jul; 79(7):859-67. PubMed ID: 10418826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does stage T3a renal cell carcinoma embrace a homogeneous group of patients?
Gofrit ON; Shapiro A; Pizov G; Landau EH; Katz R; Zorn KC; Pode D
J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1682-6. PubMed ID: 17437782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of several histopathological prognosticators and local tumour extension on oncological outcome in pT3b/c N0M0 renal cell carcinoma.
Roos FC; Weirich J; Victor A; Elsässer A; Brenner W; Biesterfeld S; Hampel C; Thüroff JW
BJU Int; 2009 Aug; 104(4):461-9. PubMed ID: 19338563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic implication of capsular invasion without perinephric fat infiltration in localized renal cell carcinoma.
Jeong IG; Jeong CW; Hong SK; Kwak C; Lee E; Lee SE
Urology; 2006 Apr; 67(4):709-12. PubMed ID: 16566981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Cleveland Clinic experience with papillary (chromophil) renal cell carcinoma: clinical outcome with histopathological correlation.
Chow GK; Myles J; Novick AC
Can J Urol; 2001 Apr; 8(2):1223-8. PubMed ID: 11375785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome of isolated renal cell carcinoma fossa recurrence after nephrectomy.
Itano NB; Blute ML; Spotts B; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):322-5. PubMed ID: 10893575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
