221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22287748)
1. Pelvic dysfunctions and quality of life after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a multicenter comparative study.
Ceccaroni M; Roviglione G; Spagnolo E; Casadio P; Clarizia R; Peiretti M; Bruni F; Peters I; Aletti G
Anticancer Res; 2012 Feb; 32(2):581-8. PubMed ID: 22287748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study].
Ju XZ; Li ZT; Yang HJ; Wu XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):605-9. PubMed ID: 20003790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Mattana F; Reato C; Solima E; Carcangiu M; Haeusler E; Mariani L; Raspagliesi F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3469-78. PubMed ID: 21556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the nerve trauma in cardinal ligament.
Chen C; Li W; Li F; Liu P; Zhou J; Lu L; Su G; Li X; Guo Y; Huang L
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 22209773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Yamamoto A; Kamoi S; Ikeda M; Yamada T; Yoneyama K; Takeshita T
J Nippon Med Sch; 2021 Nov; 88(5):386-397. PubMed ID: 32741908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Type II versus Type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions.
Raspagliesi F; Ditto A; Fontanelli R; Zanaboni F; Solima E; Spatti G; Hanozet F; Vecchione F; Rossi G; Kusamura S
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 16445968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oncologic effectiveness of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.
Ditto A; Bogani G; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Martinelli F; Chiappa V; Lopez C; Perotto S; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 May; 29(3):e41. PubMed ID: 29533024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Late morbidity following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
Cibula D; Velechovska P; Sláma J; Fischerova D; Pinkavova I; Pavlista D; Dundr P; Hill M; Freitag P; Zikan M
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):506-11. PubMed ID: 19906412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early-stage cervical carcinoma, radical hysterectomy, and sexual function. A longitudinal study.
Jensen PT; Groenvold M; Klee MC; Thranov I; Petersen MA; Machin D
Cancer; 2004 Jan; 100(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 14692029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective study of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical carcinoma in Taiwan.
Tseng CJ; Shen HP; Lin YH; Lee CY; Wei-Cheng Chiu W
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 22482969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The impact of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the surgery of cervical cancer patients].
Kornovski Y; Ismail E
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 23234009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Analysis of postoperative complications of radical hysterectomy for 219 cervical cancer patients].
Wu K; Zhang WH; Zhang R; Li H; Bai P; Li XG
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 28(4):316-9. PubMed ID: 16875638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and quality of life.
van Gent MD; Romijn LM; van Santen KE; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
Maturitas; 2016 Dec; 94():30-38. PubMed ID: 27823742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of pelvic visceral functions after modified nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
Wang W; Li B; Zuo J; Zhang G; Yang Y; Zeng H; Li X; Wu L
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 24534225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of life and sexual, bladder, and intestinal dysfunctions after class III nerve-sparing and class II radical hysterectomies: a questionnaire-based study.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Borreani C; Kusamura S; Hanozet F; Brunelli C; Rossi G; Solima E; Fontanelli R; Zanaboni F; Grijuela B; Raspagliesi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Jul; 19(5):953-7. PubMed ID: 19574791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
