These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22287812)

  • 1. A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on Mortality.
    Austin PC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2011; 46(1):119-151. PubMed ID: 22287812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement for patients with multimorbidities: a cohort study using propensity score stratification and inverse probability weighting.
    Prats-Uribe A; Kolovos S; Berencsi K; Carr A; Judge A; Silman A; Arden N; Petersen I; Douglas IJ; Wilkinson JM; Murray D; Valderas JM; Beard DJ; Lamb SE; Ali MS; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Strauss VY; Prieto-Alhambra D
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Nov; 25(66):1-126. PubMed ID: 34812138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(7):1242-58. PubMed ID: 24122911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1202-17. PubMed ID: 18972454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 18972455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.
    Austin PC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2011 May; 46(3):399-424. PubMed ID: 21818162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies.
    Austin PC
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(6):661-77. PubMed ID: 19684288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3661-79. PubMed ID: 26238958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimal full matching for survival outcomes: a method that merits more widespread use.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(30):3949-67. PubMed ID: 26250611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bias associated with using the estimated propensity score as a regression covariate.
    Hade EM; Lu B
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 23787715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the performance of the generalized propensity score for estimating the effect of quantitative or continuous exposures on survival or time-to-event outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2348-2367. PubMed ID: 29869566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Tutorial for Propensity Score Weighting for Moderation Analysis With Categorical Variables: An Application Examining Smoking Disparities Among Sexual Minority Adults.
    Griffin BA; Schuler MS; Cefalu M; Ayer L; Godley M; Greifer N; Coffman DL; McCaffrey DF
    Med Care; 2023 Dec; 61(12):836-845. PubMed ID: 37782463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing covariate balance when using the generalized propensity score with quantitative or continuous exposures.
    Austin PC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1365-1377. PubMed ID: 29415624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of propensity score methods: a case-study estimating the effectiveness of post-AMI statin use.
    Austin PC; Mamdani MM
    Stat Med; 2006 Jun; 25(12):2084-106. PubMed ID: 16220490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity score estimators for the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated may yield very different estimates.
    Pirracchio R; Carone M; Rigon MR; Caruana E; Mebazaa A; Chevret S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1938-1954. PubMed ID: 24201469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propensity-score matched samples: Imputing potential time-to-event outcomes.
    Austin PC; Thomas N; Rubin DB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):728-751. PubMed ID: 30569832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2837-49. PubMed ID: 23239115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variance estimation when using propensity-score matching with replacement with survival or time-to-event outcomes.
    Austin PC; Cafri G
    Stat Med; 2020 May; 39(11):1623-1640. PubMed ID: 32109319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.