These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22287812)

  • 21. Informing power and sample size calculations when using inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2021 Nov; 40(27):6150-6163. PubMed ID: 34510501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations.
    Austin PC
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 19197955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Propensity Score Analysis With Baseline and Follow-Up Measurements of the Outcome Variable.
    Austin PC
    Pharm Stat; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39238047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing the performance of the generalized propensity score for estimating the effect of quantitative or continuous exposures on binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2018 May; 37(11):1874-1894. PubMed ID: 29508424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(12):2037-49. PubMed ID: 18038446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimating causal effects for survival (time-to-event) outcomes by combining classification tree analysis and propensity score weighting.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):380-387. PubMed ID: 29230910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Propensity-score matching with competing risks in survival analysis.
    Austin PC; Fine JP
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(5):751-777. PubMed ID: 30347461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Influence of the Japanese Nationwide Cardiovascular Prevention System Health Guidance on Smoking Cessation Among Smokers: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Nakamura K; Watanabe M; Okuda N; Yoshita K; Kabayama M; Torii S; Kuribayashi T; Itai K; Kamide K; Miura K; Okayama A
    J Atheroscler Thromb; 2018 Apr; 25(4):323-334. PubMed ID: 29199202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Flexible regression approach to propensity score analysis and its relationship with matching and weighting.
    Mao H; Li L
    Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(15):2017-2034. PubMed ID: 32185801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An evaluation of inverse probability weighting using the propensity score for baseline covariate adjustment in smaller population randomised controlled trials with a continuous outcome.
    Raad H; Cornelius V; Chan S; Williamson E; Cro S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):70. PubMed ID: 32293286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing Propensity Score Methods Versus Traditional Regression Analysis for the Evaluation of Observational Data: A Case Study Evaluating the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.
    Amoah J; Stuart EA; Cosgrove SE; Harris AD; Han JH; Lautenbach E; Tamma PD
    Clin Infect Dis; 2020 Dec; 71(9):e497-e505. PubMed ID: 32069360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Introduction to propensity scores.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A
    Respirology; 2014 Jul; 19(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 24889820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimating the effect of treatment on binary outcomes using full matching on the propensity score.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2505-2525. PubMed ID: 26329750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of Propensity Score Methods and Covariate Adjustment: Evaluation in 4 Cardiovascular Studies.
    Elze MC; Gregson J; Baber U; Williamson E; Sartori S; Mehran R; Nichols M; Stone GW; Pocock SJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):345-357. PubMed ID: 28104076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect.
    Kurth T; Walker AM; Glynn RJ; Chan KA; Gaziano JM; Berger K; Robins JM
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 163(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 16371515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating absolute effects of treatments on survival outcomes: A simulation study.
    Austin PC; Schuster T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2214-2237. PubMed ID: 24463885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Theory and practice of propensity score analysis.
    Hashimoto Y; Yasunaga H
    Ann Clin Epidemiol; 2022; 4(4):101-109. PubMed ID: 38505253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
    Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.