These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22287917)

  • 41. Pneumocystis and Trypanosoma cruzi: nomenclature and typifications.
    Redhead SA; Cushion MT; Frenkel JK; Stringer JR
    J Eukaryot Microbiol; 2006; 53(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 16441572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. What is the fate of the abstracts submitted at the French Congress of Digestive and Hepato-biliary Surgery?
    Cauchy F; Benoist S; Gaujoux S; Régimbeau JM; Mariette C; Fuks D
    J Visc Surg; 2014 Jun; 151(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 24861940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The worldwide trend of using botanical drugs and strategies for developing global drugs.
    Ahn K
    BMB Rep; 2017 Mar; 50(3):111-116. PubMed ID: 27998396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Botanical Nomenclature in Pharmacovigilance and a Recommendation for Standardisation.
    Farah MH; Olsson S; Bate J; Lindquist M; Edwards R; Simmonds MSJ; Leon C; de Boer HJ; Thulin M
    Drug Saf; 2006 Nov; 29(11):1023-1029. PubMed ID: 29034418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Development and validation of the modular Feed-code method for qualitative and quantitative determination of feed botanical composition.
    Braglia L; Gianì S; Breviario D; Gavazzi F; Mastromauro F; Morello L
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2016 Nov; 408(29):8299-8316. PubMed ID: 27695983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pharmacokinetics of Botanical Drugs and Plant Extracts.
    Dominguez More GP; Cardenas PA; Costa GM; Simoes CMO; Aragon DM
    Mini Rev Med Chem; 2017; 17(17):1646-1664. PubMed ID: 28494732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Legitimacy is an essential concept of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes - a major revision of the Code is called for.
    Young JM
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2009 May; 59(Pt 5):1252-7. PubMed ID: 19406827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Botanical nomenclature in pharmacovigilance and a recommendation for standardisation.
    Farah MH; Olsson S; Bate J; Lindquist M; Edwards R; Simmonds MS; Leon C; de Boer HJ; Thulin M
    Drug Saf; 2006; 29(11):1023-9. PubMed ID: 17061908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Proposal to change General Consideration 5 and Principle 2 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Oren A; Garrity GM
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 64(Pt 1):309-310. PubMed ID: 24408952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Botanical insecticides inspired by plant-herbivore chemical interactions.
    Miresmailli S; Isman MB
    Trends Plant Sci; 2014 Jan; 19(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 24216132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Advances in yeast systematics and phylogeny and their use as predictors of biotechnologically important metabolic pathways.
    Kurtzman CP; Mateo RQ; Kolecka A; Theelen B; Robert V; Boekhout T
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2015 Sep; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 26136514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Clarifying the definition and role of effective publication in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes with proposals to make changes.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 Aug; 69(8):2602-2605. PubMed ID: 30860464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The subgenus names Moraxella and Branhamella (in the genus Moraxella) are not in accordance with the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria and are therefore not validly published: Supplementary information to Opinion 83. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes.
    Tindall BJ
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2014 Oct; 64(Pt 10):3595-3596. PubMed ID: 25288666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Electronic publications and their bibliographic description (an example of botanical electronic informational resources)].
    Balandin SA; Kalinichenko IM
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2001; 62(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 11548406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The current status of cyanobacterial nomenclature under the "prokaryotic" and the "botanical" code.
    Oren A; Ventura S
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2017 Oct; 110(10):1257-1269. PubMed ID: 28243951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Procedures and timetable for proposals to amend
    May TW
    IMA Fungus; 2020; 11():21. PubMed ID: 33014692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The International Botanical Congress at Stockholm.
    RAMSBOTTOM J
    Nature; 1950 Sep; 166(4219):419-22. PubMed ID: 14775694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. THE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL BOTANICAL CONGRESS.
    Bessey CE
    Science; 1914 Jan; 39(993):72-3. PubMed ID: 17841340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. NOMENCLATURE AT THE VIENNA INTERNATIONAL BOTANICAL CONGRESS.
    Britton NL
    Science; 1905 Aug; 22(555):217-9. PubMed ID: 17835754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. THE PALEOBOTANICAL EXCURSION OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL BOTANICAL CONGRESS.
    Arnold CA
    Science; 1930 Oct; 72(1869):429. PubMed ID: 17814897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.