These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22288258)
1. [Legislative and regulatory framework for medical abortion]. Ponte C Soins Pediatr Pueric; 2011; (263):20. PubMed ID: 22288258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The validity of legislative restrictions on abortion under the Oregon constitution. Tweedt DE Temple Law Rev; 1992; 65(4):1349-71. PubMed ID: 16047444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Stenberg v. Carhart: have the states lost their power to regulate abortion? Gauthier AM New Engl Law Rev; 2002; 36(3):625-68. PubMed ID: 15212038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000). Joersz M N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. So-called "partial birth abortion" bans: bad medicine? Maybe. Bad law? Definitely! Massie AM Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1998; 59(2):301-80. PubMed ID: 11902179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Brief supports partial-birth abortion ban. Catholic Church. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops [USCCB] Origins; 2006 Jun; 36(4):58-63. PubMed ID: 16832962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The vagueness of partial-birth abortion bans: deconstruction or destruction? Rurka ML J Crim Law Criminol; 1999; 89(4):1233-68. PubMed ID: 14628850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. South Carolina bans partial-birth abortions. Cooke EA S C Law Rev; 1998; 49(5):1041-57. PubMed ID: 15871154 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. State's partial-birth abortion ban supported. Chopko M; Moses M Origins; 2000 Mar; 29(38):617-23. PubMed ID: 11913443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The federal ban on so-called "partial-birth abortion" is a dangerous intrusion into medical practice. Blumenthal PD MedGenMed; 2003 Jun; 5(2):37. PubMed ID: 14603136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. Gordon A Harvard J Legis; 2004; 41(2):501-15. PubMed ID: 16596750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The phoenix of abortional freedom: is a penumbral or Ninth-Amendment right about to arise from the nineteenth-century legislative ashes of a fourteenth-century common-law liberty? Means CC N Y Law Forum; 1971; 17(2):335-410. PubMed ID: 16602212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Partial birth" abortion and the health exception: protecting maternal health or risking abortion on demand? Glidewell G Fordham Urban Law J; 2001 Apr; 28(4):1089-150. PubMed ID: 12680381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. X marks the spot while Casey strikes out: two controversial abortion decisions. Zenkich S Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(3):1001-40. PubMed ID: 16437786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute. Gough AD Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Irish abortion controversy. Pearce R New Law J; 1992 Feb; 142(6541):283, 285. PubMed ID: 16041879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Stenberg v. Carhart: women retain their right to choose. Berkowitz JF J Crim Law Criminol; 2001; 91(2):337-83. PubMed ID: 12774791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Candor and the court: the Supreme Court will confront as never before the violent nature of mid- and later-term abortion. Stith R America (NY); 2000 Apr; 182(11):13-5. PubMed ID: 11913437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion rights after South Dakota. McDonagh E Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]