196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22289153)
21. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening.
Checka CM; Chun JE; Schnabel FR; Lee J; Toth H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):W292-5. PubMed ID: 22358028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Adjunct ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk: a systematic review.
Gartlehner G; Thaler KJ; Chapman A; Kaminski A; Berzaczy D; Van Noord MG; Helbich TH
Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2013 Jun; 11(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 23750571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. BreastScreen-based mammography screening in women with a personal history of breast cancer, Western Australian study.
Houssami N; Tresham JJ; Fritschi L; Wylie LE
Med J Aust; 2011 Oct; 195(8):460-4. PubMed ID: 22004397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prospective study of breast tomosynthesis as a triage to assessment in screening.
Bernardi D; Ciatto S; Pellegrini M; Tuttobene P; Fanto' C; Valentini M; Michele SD; Peterlongo P; Houssami N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 May; 133(1):267-71. PubMed ID: 22270938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography.
Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Ernster V
JAMA; 1996 Jul; 276(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 8667536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mismatch in breast and detector size during screening and diagnostic mammography results in increased patient radiation dose.
Wells CL; Slanetz PJ; Rosen MP
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 24331271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Screening for dense breasts: digital breast tomosynthesis.
Destounis SV; Morgan R; Arieno A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Feb; 204(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 25615747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast screening with ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: evidence on incremental cancer detection and false positives, and associated cost.
Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ferrari A; Ghirardi M; Bellarosa S; Angelini O; Bani C; Sardo P; Remida G; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2008 Mar; 44(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 18267357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.
Pisano ED; Gatsonis C; Hendrick E; Yaffe M; Baum JK; Acharyya S; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Bassett L; D'Orsi C; Jong R; Rebner M;
N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(17):1773-83. PubMed ID: 16169887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mammographic changes resulting from benign breast surgery impair breast cancer detection at screening mammography.
van Breest Smallenburg V; Duijm LE; Voogd AC; Jansen FH; Louwman MW
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Sep; 48(14):2097-103. PubMed ID: 22513229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Patient Characteristics Associated With Patient-Reported Deterrents to Adjunct Breast Cancer Screening of Patients With Dense Breasts.
Miller MM; Repich K; Patrie JT; Anderson RT; Harvey JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Nov; 217(5):1069-1079. PubMed ID: 33147054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.
Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of adding screening ultrasonography to screening mammography on patient recall and cancer detection rates: a retrospective study in Japan.
Tohno E; Umemoto T; Sasaki K; Morishima I; Ueno E
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1227-30. PubMed ID: 23465737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients.
Le-Petross HT; Shetty MK
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21782116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Interval breast cancers: absolute and proportional incidence and blinded review in a community mammographic screening program.
Carbonaro LA; Azzarone A; Paskeh BB; Brambilla G; Brunelli S; Calori A; Caumo F; Malerba P; Menicagli L; Sconfienza LM; Vadalà G; Brambilla G; Fantini L; Ciatto S; Sardanelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):e84-91. PubMed ID: 24369953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
