These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22289158)

  • 1. No evidence that consistent auditory cues facilitate learning of spatial relations among locations.
    Sturz BR; Kilday ZA; Bodily KD; Kelly DM
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 22289158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: generality across spatial configurations.
    Sturz BR; Kelly DM; Brown MF
    Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19777275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A consistent but non-coincident visual pattern facilitates the learning of spatial relations among locations.
    Katz SS; Brown MF; Sturz BR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 23843178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: implications for theoretical accounts of spatial learning.
    Sturz BR; Brown MF; Kelly DM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 19293099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precedence of spatial pattern learning revealed by immediate reversal performance.
    Brown MF; Sturz BR; Andriole K; Hardesty S; Place M
    Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(3):252-64. PubMed ID: 20708663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reorienting when cues conflict: A role for information content in spatial learning?
    Sturz BR; Diemer SM
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jan; 83(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 19903512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial relational learning and memory abilities do not differ between men and women in a real-world, open-field environment.
    Banta Lavenex P; Lavenex P
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 19800920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enclosure shape influences cue competition effects and goal location learning.
    Wilson PN; Alexander T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1552-67. PubMed ID: 20119881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning associations between places and visual cues without learning to navigate: neither fornix nor entorhinal cortex is required.
    Gaffan EA; Bannerman DM; Healey AN
    Hippocampus; 2003; 13(4):445-60. PubMed ID: 12836914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory-somatosensory multisensory interactions in humans: dissociating detection and spatial discrimination.
    Sperdin HF; Cappe C; Murray MM
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Nov; 48(13):3696-705. PubMed ID: 20833194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of increasing visual load on aurally and visually guided target acquisition in a virtual environment.
    Pierno AC; Caria A; Glover S; Castiello U
    Appl Ergon; 2005 May; 36(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 15854577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory cued spatial learning in mice.
    Watanabe S; Yoshida M
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Dec; 92(5):906-10. PubMed ID: 17669446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect.
    Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans: generality across real and virtual environments.
    Sturz BR; Bodily KD; Katz JS; Kelly DM
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Mar; 12(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 18766392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial working memory and contextual cueing in patients with Korsakoff amnesia.
    van Asselen M; Kessels RP; Wester AJ; Postma A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Aug; 27(6):645-55. PubMed ID: 16019641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning directions of objects specified by vision, spatial audition, or auditory spatial language.
    Klatzky RL; Lippa Y; Loomis JM; Golledge RG
    Learn Mem; 2002; 9(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 12464695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Landmark stability: further studies pointing to a role in spatial learning.
    Biegler R; Morris RG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1996 Nov; 49(4):307-45. PubMed ID: 8962538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Encoding of variability of landmark-based spatial information.
    Sturz BR; Bodily KD
    Psychol Res; 2010 Nov; 74(6):560-7. PubMed ID: 20177902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Path information effects in visual and proprioceptive spatial learning.
    Yamamoto N; Shelton AL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Jul; 125(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 17067542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.