These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22289173)

  • 1. Judging the fitness of on-site measurements by their uncertainty, including the contribution from sampling.
    Boon KA; Ramsey MH
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Mar; 419():196-207. PubMed ID: 22289173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial contaminant heterogeneity: quantification with scale of measurement at contrasting sites.
    Taylor PD; Ramsey MH; Potts PJ
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Dec; 7(12):1364-70. PubMed ID: 16307098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty determination for nondestructive chemical analytical methods using field data and application to XRF analysis for lead.
    Bartley DL; Slaven JE; Rose MC; Andrew ME; Harper M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Dec; 4(12):931-42. PubMed ID: 17957563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing risk and increasing confidence of decision making at a lower cost: In-situ pXRF assessment of metal-contaminated sites.
    Rouillon M; Taylor MP; Dong C
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Oct; 229():780-789. PubMed ID: 28668180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty of measurement or of mean value for the reliable classification of contaminated land.
    Boon KA; Ramsey MH
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Dec; 409(2):423-9. PubMed ID: 21051077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision making under uncertainty in case of soil remediation.
    Scholz RW; Schnabel U
    J Environ Manage; 2006 Jul; 80(2):132-47. PubMed ID: 16413097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balancing measurement uncertainty against financial benefits: comparison of in situ and ex situ analysis of contaminated land.
    Taylor PD; Ramsey MH; Potts PJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Dec; 38(24):6824-31. PubMed ID: 15669345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of metal contamination using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry and the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) during remediation of a waste disposal site in Antarctica.
    Stark SC; Snape I; Graham NJ; Brennan JC; Gore DB
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Jan; 10(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 18175018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Soil sampling strategies for site assessments in petroleum-contaminated areas.
    Kim G; Chowdhury S; Lin YM; Lu CJ
    Environ Geochem Health; 2017 Apr; 39(2):293-305. PubMed ID: 27995353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of uncertainty arising from different soil sampling devices: the use of variogram parameters.
    de Zorzi P; Barbizzi S; Belli M; Barbina M; Fajgelj A; Jacimovic R; Jeran Z; Menegon S; Pati A; Petruzzelli G; Sansone U; Van der Perk M
    Chemosphere; 2008 Jan; 70(5):745-52. PubMed ID: 17888487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence systems as analytical tool for assessment of contaminated soils.
    Vanhoof C; Corthouts V; Tirez K
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Apr; 6(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 15054544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of spatial variability of soil arsenic adjacent to a disused cattle-dip site, using model-based geostatistics.
    Niazi NK; Bishop TF; Singh B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10463-70. PubMed ID: 22103445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of EPA's 16 priority pollutant polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in tank bottom solids and associated contaminated soils at oil exploration and production sites in Texas.
    Bojes HK; Pope PG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 47(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 17291653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental risk assessment of zinc in European freshwaters: a critical appraisal.
    Van Sprang PA; Verdonck FA; Van Assche F; Regoli L; De Schamphelaere KA
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Oct; 407(20):5373-91. PubMed ID: 19631966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefits, limitations and uncertainty of in situ spectrometry.
    Winkler S; Saracevic E; Bertrand-Krajewski JL; Torres A
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(10):1651-8. PubMed ID: 18520024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confronting uncertainty and missing values in environmental value transfer as applied to species conservation.
    Akter S; Grafton RQ
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1407-17. PubMed ID: 20337683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attenuation of petroleum hydrocarbons by weathering: a case study.
    Osuji LC; Udoetok IA; Ogali RE
    Chem Biodivers; 2006 Apr; 3(4):422-33. PubMed ID: 17193279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impacts of sampling design and estimation methods on nutrient leaching of intensively monitored forest plots in the Netherlands.
    de Vries W; Wieggers HJ; Brus DJ
    J Environ Monit; 2010 Aug; 12(8):1515-23. PubMed ID: 20539877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatially resolved hazard and exposure assessments: an example of lead in soil at Lavrion, Greece.
    Tristán E; Demetriades A; Ramsey MH; Rosenbaum MS; Stavrakis P; Thornton I; Vassiliades E; Vergou K
    Environ Res; 2000 Jan; 82(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 10677144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.