These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2228927)

  • 1. Specificity and sensitivity of sexually anatomically correct dolls in substantiating abuse: a pilot study.
    Realmuto GM; Jensen JB; Wescoe S
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):743-6. PubMed ID: 2228927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomically correct dolls used in interviews of young children suspected of having been sexually abused.
    Leventhal JM; Hamilton J; Rekedal S; Tebano-Micci A; Eyster C
    Pediatrics; 1989 Nov; 84(5):900-6. PubMed ID: 2797984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexualized doll play among young children: implications for the use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations.
    Everson MD; Boat BW
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 2228926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Agreement among professionals about a child's sexual abuse status: interviews with sexually anatomically correct dolls as indicators of abuse.
    Realmuto GM; Wescoe S
    Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(5):719-25. PubMed ID: 1393730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of anatomically correct dolls in the evaluation of sexually abused children.
    Goldberg CC; Yates A
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Dec; 144(12):1334-6. PubMed ID: 2244615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An assessment of the behavior of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children with anatomically correct dolls.
    Jampole L; Weber MK
    Child Abuse Negl; 1987; 11(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 3594279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The response of young, non-sexually abused children to anatomically correct dolls.
    Glaser D; Collins C
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1989 Jul; 30(4):547-60. PubMed ID: 2768357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of dolls to interview young children: issues of symbolic representation.
    DeLoache JS; Marzolf DP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1995 Aug; 60(1):155-73. PubMed ID: 7545206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Children's use of anatomically detailed dolls to recount an event.
    Goodman GS; Aman C
    Child Dev; 1990 Dec; 61(6):1859-71. PubMed ID: 2083502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of nonanatomical dolls in the sexual abuse interview.
    Britton HL; O'Keefe MA
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 1959088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of children's reports with anatomically correct dolls.
    Katz SM; Schonfeld DJ; Carter AS; Leventhal JM; Cicchetti DV
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 1995 Apr; 16(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 7790517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomical dolls: their use in assessment of children who may have been sexually abused.
    Faller KC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2005; 14(3):1-21. PubMed ID: 16203692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assumptions and beliefs about the role of AD dolls in child sexual abuse validation interviews: are they supported empirically?
    Skinner LJ
    Behav Sci Law; 1996; 14(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 10160234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavior, family function, school performance, and predictors of persistent disturbance in sexually abused children.
    Paradise JE; Rose L; Sleeper LA; Nathanson M
    Pediatrics; 1994 Mar; 93(3):452-9. PubMed ID: 8115205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children's behavioral responses to anatomically correct dolls.
    August RL; Forman BD
    Child Psychiatry Hum Dev; 1989; 20(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 2766873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
    Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpreting children's labels for sex-related body parts of anatomically explicit dolls.
    Schor DP; Sivan AB
    Child Abuse Negl; 1989; 13(4):523-31. PubMed ID: 2819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of anatomical dolls as assessment and evidentiary tools.
    Lie GY; Inman A
    Soc Work; 1991 Sep; 36(5):396-9. PubMed ID: 1925700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vulnerability or resilience to intergenerational sexual abuse: the role of maternal factors.
    Leifer M; Kilbane T; Kallick S
    Child Maltreat; 2004 Feb; 9(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 14870999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaction of normal children with anatomical dolls.
    Sivan AB; Schor DP; Koeppl GK; Noble LD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1988; 12(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 3167619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.